Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment All very stupid (Score 2) 174

Sticking up the walls of a house are a fraction of the effort. I doubt if someone compared 3d printing to other forms of construction (e.g. blockwork, icf, prefab) that the 3d printed version would justify itself in time or cost. It's snakeoil being pushed by an industry in search of a problem that doesn't exist. Oh we can solve the housing crisis with 3D printing! Nope. If someone wants to build a house, then just build a fucking house.

Comment Re:Awesome news... (Score 1) 62

All browsers have memory caches and memory pressure monitors that will flush data. If you want a citation just look at the source code of Firefox, Chromium et al or the articles that describe their strategies. RAM sitting around doing nothing is wasted and browsers will opportunistically use it until something else needs it.

Comment Re:What crime (Score 1) 151

No, it sounds exactly what an apologist would say by way of excuse for someone who egged on and assisted a troubled serviceman into stealing classified secrets. Assange is going to be put on trial for espionage and he can try his "I'm a journalist" defence against the evidence presented and see where it gets him.

Comment They didn't deny it (Score 1) 151

They've paused the extradition pending assurances the US will not try him under a death penalty. Since it was unlikely the US had any intention to, they'll submit assurances to the court and Assange can be on his merry way to the USA. Then he and his idiot followers can test his "I'm a journalist defence" when he stands trial for espionage and whatever other indictments they unseal when he sets foot on US soil. Pack your toothbrush Julian as you might be there for some time.

Comment Just wait... (Score 1) 139

... for manufacturers will find new ways to be complete dicks while in compliance with the regulations. e.g. combining electronics into large boards that are more expensive to replace, or putting functionality into ASICs, or pouring epoxy all over everything, or using specialist tools or locking nuts, or super complex communication protocols. Basically anything that massively hinders a non authorised person from affecting a repair in a cost efficient and timely manner.

Comment Re:Who uses it? (Score 1) 20

.NET is not a universal binary in the sense I meant, it's a high level language runtime. What I meant was something that was like LLVM bitcode - a close to machine code representation that can be turned into actual machine code the first time the operating system runs it. So I might have a 7z.exe, or an openoffice.exe, or a firefox.exe each with a bunch of DLLs but they're not 32-bit, or 64-bit or x86 or Arm, they're bitcode. The OS sees this, and produces a native exe & dlls which are run thereafter. It means the people making software don't care what the architecture is for the most part. Now that isn't strictly true since there might be some asm conditionally compiled into these bits of software but there is no reason that couldn't be expressed as a bitcode too.

Comment Who uses it? (Score 1) 20

A very long time ago, Microsoft released a board for Intel 8088 PCs called the Mach 20 which jacked the computer up to a 80286 so it could run OS/2. They managed to sell a whopping 11 boards.

While Windows for Arm can't be such a massive flop as the Mach 20, I do won't who the hell would ever want to run Windows on something which doesn't have an x86 architecture. Whatever "advantage" comes from using Arm in power savings or speed is negated by having to emulate x86 for the majority of stuff that makes Windows actually useful. If Microsoft had sense they would have shifted to some kind of universal binary format (that compiles natively when first run) years ago so that software was largely agnostic of CPU architecture.

Slashdot Top Deals

It is easier to write an incorrect program than understand a correct one.

Working...