That aside I was ok with photos in ads where they helped understand what was being offered. There would be very few cases video is needed, from the buyer's perspective, and is where the wheels fell off.
I get what you're saying, and I have fond memories of advertising pictures in print publications. Further to the point you made later regarding hobbies, I especially liked photos in electronics magazines. But that kind of response is why I included them in my thought experiment ban. Even still pictures can be powerfully propagandistic, promising kinds of emotional and spiritual fulfillment which the product either doesn't deliver or, worse, delivers for just long enough to instill a desire for more. An extreme example of this is pornographic photos and drawings.
TV advertising however annoyed me even as a child, because it was so intrusive.
That said, there were TV commercials which I looked forward to, and still remember six decades later. Thinking about this just now, it occurs to me that advertising might best be described as "weaponized culture". It uses elements of our culture which arose from our animal needs and desires, distills them, and delivers them as a needle delivers a drug.
One regional difference I have noticed in my world travels is bill boards, particularly those massive ones on the sides of motorways. Here in New Zealand they are practically non-existent, compared with parts of the USA and China, where they are a major eyesore.
Here in my part of Canada we have a new roadside phenomenon. They are electronic billboards which look something like an inverted golf club, with the handle in the ground and a giant video screen covering the face of the club. These things are very high, so if they catch a driver's attention then the driver is moving his eyes even farther off the road ahead. I wonder how many accidents these things will cause. More pain and death as sacrifices to the god of wealth concentration. Yay!