Dunning-Kruger ensures that there will be countless people who suddenly have a background in macroeconomics and public finance.

Windows11 anecdotally has some distinct glitches on systems that run multiples of certain types of pro audio devices. Because pro audio is the single application for which I use Windows, and in fact the only reason I've *ever* used Windows at all, this is of enormous concern for me. The only truly annoying thing I've noticed is that as a side-docker, I can't handle the fixed location of the taskbar. But as strictly a single application user I really don't want a desktop environment at all, just a host OS for my application and maybe a terminal console for file management and administration.

I've never run Windows for anything else real. Linux was either my 4th or 5th Unix, depending on whether Coherent counts. I went straight from the minicomputer world of the 80s to the Unixes of the 90s and was an early adopter of Linux, which works for absolutely everything I do except pro audio. I know Apple is a thing. I know Linux audio is a thing, I've had a hand in developing it. I don't even hate Windows, but I dislike forced platform changes.

LoL, that was pretty retarded.

I was trying to post a link to this

Jeesus Christ. Did you read that link before you posted? Literal fake news.

Amongst all the other bullshit and scaremongering is the smoking gun. They say the gas-stoves-contribute-to-poor-quality-report is 9 paragraphs long. It's not. It's 34 PAGES

Check it out yourself

And none of this is new, or even slightly controversial information. Burning methane indoors reduces air quality. Duh. It is only news to some because up until recently, this was lost in the background of shitty air quality from everything else. Now our air is relatively clean, gas or no gas can make an actual difference.

So how about you fuck off to whatever little hole you came out of - either you're a useful idiot for those trying to ignite new & pointless culture wars, or a miserable fucking troll. Either way, Fuck. Right. Off.

LoL,

In your haste to blame TEH UNIONS on everything, you've come off looking like a complete fuckwit.

With this level of ineptitude, I suspect the reason whatever software you were writing was cancelled was done to your own incompetence.

Congratulations, that is the stupidest thing I have read all day, and I've just gotten out of an all day workshop with Test management, so that's saying something.

When Apple shipped their phones with chargers, they didn't include each power outlet type. Why would they have to now?

Beyond stupid.

Going to need a cite for that, because my memory is screaming that this is the opposite of what happened.

(Trump's vaccine? FFS).

Sleazebag. Mentally undress someone close to your own age.

Hate to break this to you, but when you reference something & include negative adjectives with your description, then your reference becomes a complaint.

Why don't you try to meet and marry a woman who is your equal (in pay, intellect, etc).

It strikes me that many men who want a 'traditional' marriage want subservience. And of course, what do they get? A fucking scammer. And they deserve it.

Most likely? Probably? If only there was something like an article about these floods that could be linked to and get more information from.

Oh, the linked fucking article says:

So put your speculative bullshit away and fuck off with your fossil fuel industry talking point distractions.

I feel stupid for having read that. Why did you even include that sentence in your content-free post?

Above average rainfall and below average rainfall are weather events? WOW THANK YOU FUZZMASTER FOR CLEARING THAT UP FOR US. Fucking hell.

WRONG. Gay and bisexual are not the same. The literature is talking about men who have sex with men precisely for this reason.

WRONG. Men who have sex with men are also more likely to kiss, fondle, finger etc multiple partners. At the very least we should reserve judgement until more evidence rolls in. If close contact is all that is needed and superkendall-like researchers have discounted that possibility, then we'll be fucked if it hits childcare / etc.

WRONG. Women also suppress feelings of revulsion when they're horny.. An unsurprising evolutionary twist for a species who's sexual organs serve a dual purpose / are close to excretory organs.

Changes to the environment WRT to nature are neither better nor worse. Nature does not work like that.

Human population has increased from half a billion 500 years ago, to 1 billion 100 years ago to 8 billion now. As we've spread out, we've changed the environment to suit us. There are some species other than humans (rats, pigeons, cows, thistles, corn, etc) who's fitness for survival is improved by these changes, but far, far more species who's fitness decreases in human-changed landscapes.

So think instead that instead of many diverse landscapes & environments with different challenges providing many different survival options, we have far fewer landscapes & environments providing far fewer survival options.

See? Do you understand now? It is not that humans inherently are bad for nature. Its just that we reduce environmental diversity & hence reduce species diversity. There is nothing remotely suspicious about this at all and it is certainly not a paradox.

We hate Angular more than we hate Drupal. Survey results seem accurate based on that alone.