This is an interesting concept, if not exactly applicable to 21st century reality. Or maybe you think magically Joe Buttonpusher and Sue Phoneanswerer are suddenly going to develop the aptitude and skills for knowledge work? Hahaha.

This has nothing to do with an absolute right of privacy. The 4th Amendment clearly spells out the power the government has regarding search and seizure. This has nothing to do with a right to privacy. This has to do with a limitation of government power that according to Obama logic needed to be destroyed so our rights could be saved.

Let's take a close look

Is it your position that the secret courts have warrants fitting this description for the information they are collecting?

Guess you missed the part where he's being charged with espionage.

You are aware there's a massive difference between tin-hatted "I know they're watching me" bullshit espoused on sites like this and the actual facts revealed in this matter, right? I hope you're aware, anyway. The alternative is that you're a moron.

Imagine if an operating system sold on the majority of personal computers had any basis of comparison to an SDK.

I guess maybe learn something more than running things smarter people wrote and someone might give a shit about your feelings.

I guess it was easy in the old days when no one gave a shit if your software actually did anything. Unfortunately for the real world, you don't just get to target 15 or 20 experts anymore. There are now BILLIONS of users.

The scale probably hasn't sunk through the grey yet, but don't worry, you'll die someday and not have to worry about it.

I like C#. .NET is fine for what it is, although it's very apparent where the influences came from. Where Java absolutely wins, in my experience, is the sheer volume of libraries available. You can do damn near anything with some dependency declarations and a bit of glue code.

Hahah it's easily justifiable to have Congress force companies to provide entertainment the way you want?

We truly live in the age of entitlement.

Either you refer to your family as "users" which is certainly charming, or you're illegally distributing entertainment. Given your history, I assume both.

I don't know much, but I'm absolutely certain that "obvious to an anonymous coward after it's been explained to him" isn't the test that matters.

Your impersonator seems smarter than you. Maybe you should just let him do the talking.

Can we stop using the concept of trolling to mean anything you don't like? It had an actual meaning once, but you kids have watered it down so much it means almost as little as the word "evil" now.

I'm not sure you understand the meaning of the word "force"

There's a massive difference between most people and most people you know