Because the presidency is not a dictatorship. A president can issue an illegal/unconstitutional executive order. However, our court system, as part of our systems of checks and balances, has the authority to block illegal/unconstitutional executive orders.

I wouldn't blame Google for this. You don't want to be caught violating US export controls, which is what Google is here trying to prevent from happening. If anything, you can blame the US Government.

We really need to figure out a way to secure BGP announcements.

> we worked around the clock (literally) to fix it

So they put a clock in the middle of the room and arranged their desks around it?

Are you sure this was posted correctly? Really looks like an ad.

This would undoubtedly drive business away from US companies that provide information services to users overseas, we is precisely what we need for economy. Make America Great Again(tm)!

Joking aside, how is a drug investigation a matter of national security? If you're going to claim you need some power for national security reasons, then only use it for national security reasons. Don't then turn around and use it to prosecute drug offenses.

There is a big difference between "A Bug in Twitter's Old Vine App May Have Exposed Your Email" and "A Bug in Twitter's Old Vine App May Have Exposed Your Email Address".

As much as I feel for the families of those who were killed, there isn't much you can do. This lawsuit just feels like a desperate attempt at answers where they don't exist.

No court would expect the operators of social networks to pour billions of dollars into moderating their platforms. They can remove content when its found and reported, but it is completely unreasonable to expect the operators of social media platforms to keep their platforms free of terrorist material while at the same time keeping it open enough to be usable.

We were forced into buying credit for their cloud to settle a licensing compliance dispute. The credit was only good for 12 months so we gave it a try.

It completely sucks. Nobody should ever use it. Just use AWS, Google, or Azure instead, they've actually got mature cloud models, unlike Oracle.

Nevermind, I'm dumb. TFA already says the partner gets 5%.

Will they be sharing revenue with the partnered streamer? Would be another way to support the streamer that you're watching. If not, then it seems like its just a cash grab by Twitch/Amazon.

I guess other countries have to come to their own conclusions, but at least in the US this has been settled. If you don't want something available publicly, put authentication on it. This isn't hard guys.

You're linking to a party that is legally hosting the content, how is that infringement?

Guess what is now blocked at the edge of my network?