Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Cue the science deniers in ... (Score 2, Funny) 407

No one wants to give out a number.

There are model calculations for that. Go look them up if you're interested. Of course, it's not a very plausible scenario, so I can imagine that there's only limited interest in exploring it.

....there are model calculations for marching the secret climate police across the entire world to stop all carbon emissions?!?!?!

Comment Re:Cue the science deniers in ... (Score 1) 407

So the answer above is, if ALL emissions are ceased, the climate impacts will cease ('approximately cancelling').

Which means that you're running a scam here.

If you marched your secret climate police across the entire world to stop all carbon emissions, how long will that take? No one wants to give out a number.

Comment Re:Cue the science deniers in ... (Score 1) 407

I'm yo huckleberry...

However, what I'd like to ask is how many years do "science slashdotters" expect it to take before slowing down the increase of whatnots into the atmosphere is supposed to do anything on the order of slowing down climate change.

It's a very simple question. Don't try to overthink it; just put out a number. I have a rough guess. Let's compare.

Comment Re:Conflict of interest (Score 1) 127

The real issue isn't getting the service as practical as facebook, IMO it's already there.

Well, you're wrong. Critical social-mass requires an ease-of-use that is equivalent to FB's. Ease of use is what hooked people. Unfortunately, there's probably not any money in solving this problem.

Comment Re:Conflict of interest (Score 1) 127

Google's search algorithm business should be nationalized, its patents freed. Then their ad network would be much less offensive.

Facebook is different. We would need a magic-box-software install from which non-tech people could publish their own content, then a .torrent-based publicization method. It would end up similar to Newsgroups, but the security & trust problems are significant ("magic").

Comment Re:Consolidation of the Production of Value (Score 1) 651

why should you care that someone is making more, a lot more, than you?

Well, they probably don't pay near the tax rate I do, and they have the ability to incorporate and speak more often in elections than I do. Other than that, I personally don't hold a vague, nonspecific grudge.

Comment Re:Ok, Greens. (Score 1) 629

Everyone is pretending. Everyone plays make-believe to support their own side.

Pretending that you can control everyone is folly. Wanting to is worse.

The plans you seem to advocate will take a thousand years to impact what is already set in motion.

It will be ugly, brutish and nasty. Pretending it won't happen in our lifetime is folly. Pretending you can stop it in a dozen lifetimes probably is, too.

Slashdot Top Deals

To the systems programmer, users and applications serve only to provide a test load.

Working...