I have been doing just as you suggested. The problem, beside our shit economy, is finding the juxtaposition of talent, interest and availability. Most have the interest, it's a pretty cool idea, but most don't have the availability or want to get involved at this very early, risky stage.

It's the occasional affirmation like this that make it easier to get through the day! Thanks.

Oddly enough, although I don't know Bunny. I'm been keeping up with him over the years. As the software architect for the xbox manufacturing software, I was deeply involved in XBox security and read, with admiration, the process of this analysis of necessary security approaches and possible weaknesses.. Since I've also spent a lot of time in the Chinese manufacturing sector, I could also sympathize with his experiences. He would be a wonderful guy to work with, but I don't think this is his kind of project. What a nice thought, though. ---- Dennis

Thanks for the thoughts. I've had to stay mum about the idea until I got the International patent applied for. Even though I had a provisional, that doesn't protect international rights if you've made a public disclosure. Now that I've finally made my domestic and international filing, I can finally talk about it and seek help in developing what is really a very naiscent technology. Hence this post.

You've made a bad assumption about how I measure phase change. It's the same approach that the wikipedia article on RF motion capture makes and comes up with the same error. The 1mm accuracy I got was using a somewhat arbitrary wavelength 0f 24 feet, 40 MHz. Accuracy, in my system, is only casually related to frequency.

Thanks, the first thing I did was get great lawyers. I also spent 6 years working on the XBox, so am familiar with the gaming industry. While gaming applications seem like a natural fit, ala the wii, simpler interfaces like the Natal are mostly sufficient of in-game movement. It's sports, medicine, exercise, and veternary gait analysis that are better fit markets.

Sorry to give the impression that I wanted to "go it alone". That's just how it's worked out. I'm actively seeking help any way I can get it, particularly someone to drive the business. I just can't afford to hire anyone.

You don't have to be an RF guy to think in terms of waves and wave interference.

Good questions. 1. I want to grow a company to support and license the technology. 2. Run it? Not me, I'm the CTO, not the CEO. 3. I don't think this is necessary an either/or for a company that focuses on licensing rather than product.

Never heard the term Dragon before. Sounds like an Angel that's gone to the dark side.

Nope, nothing like it. I've described the basic approach in a few other posts.

The standard ISM frequencies work quit well for my app. The solution is somewhat frequency agnostic.

Would you like an address in order to send your $50. You are wrong on every count.

Oh, I agree and if I were 20-something again, I'd would be clerking down at the Zippy mart right now. But, alas, I'm an old man with a full burden of house payments and kids in college, so selling squishies at the quickimart just doesn't make an appreciable dent in my basic nut.

Thanks for the positive message. I've had a bunch of folks saying I was doing it the right way, but haven't yet found that partner, either a business partner or co-developing company yet. I've been getting quite a few messages now, so maybe something will come of this. Again, thanks for the strokes. --- Dennis