Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment They Should Lose It Here Too (Score 0, Troll) 185

Twitter and Tumbler especially should not qualify for safe harbor under ANY set of laws. These laws are meant to allow platforms to censor content without worry of reprisal if they happen to miss something. What these platforms do instead is selectively promote certain content to drive controversy. I love the term "emotional pornography" to describe it. People go to these sites to invoke feelings, so to drive traffic up these places put the most contentious content front and center. At that point they are no longer passive hosts, they are driving the conversation and are just as responsible as the people who post it.

Comment SMB? (Score 1, Insightful) 41

So the entire thing is dependent on the target sharing files via SMB. Furthermore, a new VM isn't going to have domain credentials and unless I missed something, the targeted files would have to allow full access to the 'Everybody' group, which no one does. It's smart, but I feel like we're missing about half of the analysis here.

Comment Re:You can't do security by buying a *thing*. (Score 1) 50

I'm speaking more on the predictive side. If you see a large group of 18-30 year old's walking in close proximity to each other, all wearing blue for example and on the other side of the mall there is a similar group all wearing red; you would have to be an absolute moron not to preemptively call the police. At the same time, there is so much in fighting among these groups that an AI isn't going to realise that one group wearing red and black is effectively at war with the another group wearing black and red. Before you scoff at it, YES, things quite often get this stupid among these groups. It's not about race either, swap out the above with Hell's Angels and Black Pistons\Outlaws you'd still have to be brain dead not to call the police.

Comment Re:You can't do security by buying a *thing*. (Score 1) 50

You can't use AI to monitor crime because as soon as you notice certain patterns arise in certain demographics you get called racist and brought before a kangaroo court. Because what to a normal thinking person might be evidence of gang affiliation, i.e. an ethnic group favoring certain symbols and primary colors for example, must be ignored to the point of enacting violence on the observer who calls attention to it by the retarded tumbler generation. And whilst a security guard can keep this knowledge to himself and not compromise his ability to act on facts; any Artificial Intelligence has it's brain wide open for reading and intentional misinterpretation by any Gen-X'pert who wants his name in the paper or thinks this slacktivism will get that 20 something year old intern to notice him.

If not for that reason then quite simply AI can't testify; and I for one would rage at the idea of being denied my right to face my accuser for the fact that I'm being accused by a God Damn math equation.

Comment Re:Point of comparison (Score 1) 123

Which is one of the reasons why they're so much more price competitive when they compete in the same field as others.

No, China is only "Price competitive" in any field because of their artificial suppression of the yuan\renminbi. The actual value of that denomination is as high as 33 cents USD. Let it come to parity and we'll see what happens to China's market dominance.

Comment Re:On-call (Score 2) 41

I promise you that there system is cloud based with an MSP handling the day to day hell-desk requirements. When your only asset is data and your only service is linking data points, you NEED instant, geographically spread out site redundancy even if it's just to ensure shortest path routing. This is exactly the crap that the cloud was born for.

Comment Re:What was the reason to drop the program? (Score 1) 127

The article reads like "We gave these people an internship where we could accurately evaluate their abilities and when it came time to hire the ones who weren't headhunted for better jobs, the optics of paying them what they are worth were very bad. So we took it upon ourselves to shut the program down rather than invoke some kind of shitstorm on Twitter.". If you have "Internship at Google" on your resume then that's a golden ticket into the second interview. You have to be a complete screwup to NOT be able to capitalize on that.

Comment Re:"we have policies" (Score 1) 135

Yes, you target the larger share of the crimes. Use the same system to monitor male users, sure. But numbers are more important than some half assed "Men Are Important Too" movement.

What guidelines are they to use when the females profile says she is 18 and the conversation is legal? How much are you willing to payout in damages for falsely reporting someone?

You misunderstand, Facebook isn't becoming the police in this scenario. They are filtering for potential cases and forwarding those to the experts. So if the girl turns out to be of age, then the Feds drop it, no harm done. And you DON'T "payout for damages"; in this scenario Facebook becomes a Mandated Reporter, which they kind of should be.

you are basically saying women are too gullible to be allowed on to the internet without being watched over.

Yes, I am saying this is true of teenage and preteen girls 100%. Ideally it would be their parents watching them, but kids are sneaky whereas the service facilitating the conversations cannot be cut out of the equation

Comment Re:"we have policies" (Score 1) 135

Monitor the connections between people. You already know the majority of victims are going to be female, you ignore what they say their age is and develop an :"Age Profile" based on their interests and check ins. The perpetrators culture is going to play a part in this, you're not targeting their race but a 25-35 year old Male who just moved from Yemen to New York and immediately starts friending and messaging 14 year olds in his area that he has no social connections with should set off alarms. You flag those for monitoring and review, forward whatever you need to the FBI. Grooming takes time, there is usually no need for real time intervention.

Comment Re:No Thanks Google1984 (Score 1) 46

Ha, you wish

"Mr Buttle, it appears you are having a Heart Attack. Due to unsubstantiated accusations of Wrong Think from unappointed and unregulated special interest groups who would cease to exist if they ever ran out of people to slander, your account has been suspended and our privatized ambulance service cannot be dispatched until billing has been restored. Your primary insurance provider has been notified of your new medical status as per our existing agreements that you in no way benefit from dictate. As you are a Silver member, the "Notify Next of Kin" feature has been disabled. Please upgrade to a Gold Membership at the additional cost of $9.99 a month to enable this feature. Google1984 is provided "As Is" WITHOUT WARRENTY OF ANYKIND. WITHOUT LIMITING THE FOREGOING, WE EXPLICITLY DISCLAIM ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THESE TERMS OR THE Google1984 SERVICE, INCLUDING ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, QUIET ENJOYMENT OR NON-INFRINGEMENT, AND ANY WARRANTIES ARISING OUT OF COURSE OF DEALING OR USAGE OF TRADE. Google1984 is not a medical service and should not be relied on as such. We make no warranty regarding the quality, accuracy, timeliness, truthfulness, completeness, or reliability of the Google1984 Service

Comment Re:I thought . . . (Score 0, Troll) 105

Improved company? How, by tying every new install of Windows 10 to a Live ID, recreating it's own walled garden with it's App Store shifting it's business focus from a development and management platform to "Easy to use for Grandma"? Get out of here with your wanna-be-Apple fan boy crap. The Microsoft of today is monkey see monkey do of every other business around it. This Nadella guy has no vision and no imagination. He is a cancer on the company.

Comment Re:Bad for the Economy, Good for the Planet (Score 1) 145

I only ever see this "solution" from people in an academic bubble. Most of these "layabouts" are UNEMPLOYABLE. Were you to give these people a job, they would require more in resources to supervise then could ever possibly recover from their labor and what's more, they inconvenience and infuriate the rest of your workforce and customer base in the process. We actually need to EXPAND these programs until I never have to deal with another mouth breathing jackass at a corner store who fails three times in a row to run a credit card because "No one told them" they had to press the giant "CONTINUE" button on their screen to process a transaction. We need to put the definition of legally disabled back at 85 where it was before this need to be polite took over our ability to make rational decisions and just pay these people to stay home and out of societies way.

Slashdot Top Deals

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...