Their release notes even state that it resolves "critical security vulnerabilities" - https://community.wd.com/t/2-3...

Also, I don't think releasing a firmware update is doing nothing.

Forgot the link: http://zipatlas.com/us/zip-cod...

Plus, according to the site I linked below, 29,394 out of 31,799 US zip codes have 50% or more white population. That comes out to 92.4% of all zip codes. And they are surprised that 94% of apple stores are in majority white zip codes? It's simple statistics (and a bit of sampling error)!

1. Shielding a Nazi Officer Wanted for War Crimes

2. The Internment of Japanese Citizens During World War II

3. The Overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii

4. The Tuskegee Experiment

5. An Apology for Slavery and the Jim Crow laws

"I really think it's Space Dust. I read an article on NASA's website about it. It's a growing problem."

It's a 1,000 word minimum high school english paper, and "Our story begins with author Alan E. Nourse" wasn't verbose enough.

That wouldn't actually solve the problem, it would just make it slightly more difficult to mock. App developers have full control over the appearance of their apps. Sure, they wouldn't be able to use stock UI components to mimic the dialog, but they could still create custom dialogs that look identical to anything that Apple implements. Apple just needs to move away from prompting in a dialog, and tell the user that they need to go to settings to log in. Do away with a little bit of convenience to eliminate the security flaw.

Really? You think it's easier to copy the contours and depths of a face than a fingerprint that you can collect with a piece of tape?

This is one of the few times I have seen "incredible" used to mean what it actually means. Well done, sir.

"So you're saying there's a chance... YES!" -- Lloyd

Yes, and the distribution of those people is important. If fingerprints have 150,000 people randomly distributed through the entirety of earth's population that would unlock your phone, that's not bad. It would be pretty hard to find one of those people. It would be much better than say, in the worst case, that the 7,500 people that can unlock your phone with FaceID happen to be your 7,500 closest relatives, which would be fairly easy to find. This is an extreme example, but it demonstrates my point in the importance of the distribution.

Not exactly... There is a higher probability of false matches due to fewer distinguishing features, but that doesn't mean all of them look alike. Just that there are more groupings of look-alikes than with adults.

Correction: 39th

It's a pity that "Araksas" came in 34th. Poor Araksas.