The genetic fallacy?

There is something wrong with your links?

We keep telling the same limited set of jokes over and over again, don't we? Anytime there's a post about mathematics, some wit always posts, "The answer is 42!" Anytime there's an article about astronomy, some comedic genius is sure to make the same pun about Uranus (whether or not the article actually had anything to do with Uranus.) Whenever there's about a post involving lasers, someone is sure to mention sharks. Etc.

But all is not lost; imagine what we can do with a Beowulf cluster of completely worn-out, unfunny jokes!

What makes Wayland annoying to use for me is that I can't give the monitor a gamma adjustment. Xgamma doesn't work, and there doesn't seem to be any replacement for it.

Yeah, you're thinking of his essay "The Relativity of Wrong."

Jokes used to be funny... now they're just repetitive.

Imagine what we could do with a Beowulf cluster of unfunny, repetitive jokes, you insensitive clod!

Nitpick: I believe you mean cyclamates rather than saccharin.

Well, it might be necessary to nuke your lunch in order to warm it up.

Well, the actual editorial is titled "Why Nature will not allow the use of generative AI in images and video." So apparently it's not all AI which is banned.

And it doesn't require Javascript for anything; in fact, it works perfectly well with lynx.

And Netcraft confirms it . . .

Ohh, comment editing! At first I thought the GP was referring to Slashdot's lack of "editing" in a quite different sense.

No, they don't. They're congruent to each other, and therefore constitute "a single shape" in the sense which is operative in this problem.

Oh, perfect. Now the astronauts will have all kinds of trouble getting out of Witt's End.

So Ruby++ will be a successful language?