Prostitution?

6227020800?

Parent was just giving you an example.He was asking you to open your mind to other solutions. Of course you could also save energy and since you guys are all buring oil/gas to warm your houses, how about this observation of a small town in the UK:

When I was looking to rent a house in Cheshire a few years ago, a lot of the ads mentioned "double glazed windows" as a selling point. Imagine that! A house with a bit of thermal insulation, in a country where the temperature will often drop to 0 C / 32 F during mid-winter?

Also, every house we looked at had a gap of at least one centimeter under the entrance door, where cold air could enter, and they all had (funny but true) a form of stretched out pillow to put there, in order to reduce the drag. When I first got there I had to buy a fridge since it was not considered a "fixed appliance", but until I got that sorted, I actually stored my butter and milk in the hallway since it was so cold.

Ok.

I refuse to explain myself coherently, on the grounds that I may invalidate the apparent logic of your statement.

Either:
a) a low income has little to do with the worth of a persons contributions to society
or
b) artists who are unable to make any money due to piracy are worthless.

Perhaps your supposed societal non-contributor is also a suffering artist who isn't paid? If people are worthless to society if they are not getting paid and artists are not getting paid -> artists are worthless to society.

With a statement like yours, you must really hate artists. What did they ever do to you?

I accept your challenge:
The Swedish market for telecommunication was deregulated during the 90's and is much cheaper with strong competition. We have at least three major parallel mobile networks covering almost all of the country. A lot of small telcos have sprung up selling "old copper". Before anyone brings up the old "yes, but you are such a small country, so it is different" argument, let me mention that we have a population the size of New York spread out over a country the size of Texas. Besides the lower prices and higher speeds, we also get much faster administration when setting up, moving or closing (yes really) an account.

100MB/s broadband at $60/month
80MB/s mobile broadband at $91/month (introduced recently, will lower once mainstream)
Mobile phone at $17/month

That said, the so called "free" nordic energy market and the similarly "free" railroad market are complete jokes. During last winter at least 2 of our nuclear reactors where closed for scheduled maintenance mid-winter. During winter temperature in Stockholm can reach -25 C / -13 F and in Northland it can reach -40 C / -40 F. Not an optimal time for scheduled maintenance but the energy companies said... "Oops, we will schedule differently next year. Sorry for the high prices.". This year maintenance was in the fall, with at least one nuclear reactor still being worked on/upgraded during early winter.

The problem is definitely not a true free market. For the Swedish energy market here are some of the problems.

• Too little transfer capacity between the nordic countries as well as between Sweden and the baltic states
• Prices are based on what the most expensive plant in operation is charging, so by creating a shortage prices can jump from cheap nuclear to expensive gas production a.k.a. a stepwise market
• Denmark and Norway have on occasion decided not to allow more power to go Sweden even though a free market would have allowed this our industry was ready to pay more.
• The baltic states need more energy after being strong-armed politically by the EU to close the unsafe Ignalina nuclear plant in Estonia (had Tjernobyl design). Our connected cousins have too little energy, but a free market, so we also get higher prices as we export our cheap hydro- and nuclear power.
• Sweden has a a political ban on building more nuclear power
• Sweden has a political ban on building more hydro power.
• It is politically incorrect for power producers to build oil, gas or coal powered plants due to increased CO2.
• The government is subsidizing upgrades to current plants, but by allowing power producers to get paid for the FULL EFFECT an improved plant and not on the increased effect compared to the old plant, politicians have set consumers up to be taken advantage of.

To me, producers get paid for investing in their own already profitable plants and plants taken off-line during winter are signs of corruption, dishonesty and incompetence. Deregulation works beautifully when politicians are competent and honest. Despite my normal cynicism I do on occasion admit that there are honest politicians out there. This is one such occasion.

Certain medical conditions will improve and worsen spontaneously. If you are given a placebo-drug during spontaneous improvement, why would you not connect the improvement to the drug? Likewise, if you are given a drug that really does have some positive effect on symptoms, during spontaneous worsening of symptoms, why would you not connect your worsening condition to the active drug? The active drug is also likely to have side effects, which the placebo will not. Unless the improvement on the main condition with the active drug is dramatic, the placebo may end up either on par or even ahead of the active drug for this type of condition.

Why not pit a hidden placebo against a publicly stated placebo?

Crimes against the Humanities.

Sorry for the late reply.

You claim that I expanded my arguments from "the youth" to "the people" and from "breaking the law" to weather or not they support the laws. I've tried to argue from the position that "the people" must perceive laws imposed upon them to be just, all the time. I'm sorry if I strayed off course.

A large percentage of our voters break the law when they speed on the motorway, but still a large percentage of the voters also support those same traffic laws. Although a majority of Swedish youth now file-share illegally, me arguing against making this illegal (the law came into effect in 2006, making the sharing of copyrighted files not-for-profit illegal, beyond your closest relatives and a "few" friends) was that the VOTERS, not only file-sharing youth, would consider such a law unjust. When the voters did not want the law and the then would-be prime minister stated before the election that "we can not criminalize and entire generation of youths" the voters/"the people" took this to mean "we will not impose this law on the people". He then proceeded to act on US pressure which had been present from 2004 and onwards, and imposed this type of law on "the people".

I do not file-share illegally but I still can not see how something that strongly reminds me of recording music from the radio when I was young can be such a crime. A lot of the Swedish voters see it the same way. Back then, if you "broke a window" you or your parents had to pay for a new window. Now if you "break a window" you or your parents have to pay for all the broken windows on the planet, because it is easier for the people who own buildings. "Break a window an we will destroy you" does not feel just. (I read that you also did not support hefty fines in file-sharers. I'm just trying to make you see how otherwise sane and honest Swedish voters could possibly be against this law.)

I do not consider his statement to be dumb at all, since I want laws to be perceived as just by the people. I believe strongly that any justice system that is not perceived as just, will make people more prone to violence. People will not hate the system as much as they will hate the ones perceived to be receiving all the benefits of the system.

All those laws which you claim he would also need to disavow have strong support from the people.

Did you have an opinion on the democracy issues I raised?