Considering how much of the geek community resides near SFO (and flies SFO), it's perfectly justified. I can't think of anywhere with a greater concentration of slashdotters.

Just to elaborate even more (edit function please), anyone who lives around SF and flies knows that the airport is 10 miles south of the city. So an airplane crashing within city limits would be extremely bizarre. Very little air traffic is actually routed through the city...in fact I think most planes that fly overhead are ads for car insurance companies and tires during baseball games.

Just to elaborate, the headline made me think 7/6 would be to Silicon Valley what 9/11 is to New York.

...just saying...

IEEE wrote that? Watch out...if Jesse Ventura runs for president, the prophecy may be fulfilled...

Not sure why your post got mod hate, it was a decent post. And I agree with you about it being believable. It's by far the most believable Superman film/TV show ever. Its believability is one of two things I'll mention to people who haven't seen the movie yet. (aside from the major WTF being "Kryptonians widely colonized the galaxy and all those colonies failed?!")

The other being the unignorable and obvious Jesus references...

p.s. Pa Kent didn't really get shafted. I thought he was reasonably cautious, and he never wavered from his convictions.

The submitter probably doesn't have access to their version control.

However, if they can show their work remotely, they could easily find an archive.org link to an older version. I believe javascript files are archived just like everything else. This could possibly be useful if the submitter decides to take legal action -- I think they have some grounds to do so.

Old star trek does have some documentary qualities, with the captain's log being a comparable narrative style. The older Star Trek was far more cerebral than the recent two movies, but it's easier to fit cerebral into a lower budget-per-minute production. (And shorter movies need more action to get butts in the seats :p )

I agree with you pretty much completely, but you have to admit, it's still an effective package. You can dislike something and still admire its ability to perform some task. It's the kind of respect that an atheist who works for an advertising agency might have.

Not only unethical, but kind of pointless. Western religions aren't exactly subtle -- if you've reached adulthood and don't follow any, then you're probably not the kind of person who ever would.

p.s. Law only applies to headlines, but still funny.

But to have a sense of purpose in a meaningless world, it needs to be packaged properly. Religion is just a very effective and time-tested vessel for purpose.

Separation of state and federal responsibilities was put into the constitution for one reason: to allow the unification to occur, period. Since then, it has evolved to allow a decent amount of legal experimentation as well as giving individuals options under the same national umbrella. The local distinction mostly allows for small communities to define their own unique ways of life at a finer level. Local police have been phasing out of this role for some time and tend to be just copies of the local police on the other side of the state. With microcultures disappearing from the US, it's not unthinkable that they could some day be phased out in some states and merged with the state police.

Somehow I got off on a tangent there but when people talk about federal and state redundancy, they typically aren't talking about the front facing organizations. Instead they are referring to multiple welfare programs targeting the same disadvantage, or internal administrative organizations that do the same task and/or conflict with each other, or multiple organizations that enforce the same law or similar laws. Many of the overlaps don't even need to include both federal and state.

Don't ask me to list too many examples since I'm on a phone, though I have heard horror stories about Federal and CA ADA/disability laws conflicting with each other.

The Soviet ruble was converted at varying exchange rates to the new local currencies.
The eastern mark was converted to deutsche marks.
A better example would be Zimbabwe but even that didn't happen overnight.

I'm not arguing against diversification here, I'm just arguing that the USD would take a lot of work to be rendered worthless. (understatement of the thread right there)

By the way, my original concern was that organizations with clout like EFF are being distracted by Bitcoin, away from better designed alternatives. Just a mindshare concern...not alleging that Bitcoin is standing high on a cliff, bellowing "YOU SHALL NOT PASS!"

Thanks for bringing these up. I never heard of any of them, as I'm not "in the know" and searching for alternatives to bitcoin mostly brings up "bitcoin is the new shiny alternative to evil rotten fiat currency", as well as direct Bitcoin clones like Litecoin which suffer from the same flaws. I will definitely do my homework with your alternatives!