100M (10ATM) water resistance is usually considered the minimum for swimming due to the forces exerted while swimming.
I too was disappointed by this. However, i have, and continue to use my apple watch for swimming (miles in both pools and open water) and surfing. No problems yet after years of doing this.
I suspect the watches are capable of more than the minimum to meet the WR50 standard, but apple only goes after the minimum standard to cut down on warranty claims from people who would take it scuba diving and stuff.
yeah. i don't really see anything wrong with this. I've seen plenty of say civil war documentaries where voice actors will read correspondence from the war. I've never felt like i was being tricked. i've never stopped and thought, "wait a minute! that guy never said that!"
If i think about it, the actor has the ability to insert emotion into some text in such a way to convey meaning that actually wasn't there when Lincoln, or Sherman, or whatever guy on the front lines originally wrote the letter. Is that deception?? maybe in the wrong hands, but newsflash, the ability to manipulate your viewer through careful media production already exists and is plenty effective. That doesn't mean we shut down all production.
I think voice narration of written documents is worthwhile to help communicate that this isn't just text on a paper, these are the thoughts of a human that existed. Human speakers are fine. this tech seems fine and could be really powerful. If Ken Burns wants to do it, so be it.
To me he always seemed like a good writer trying to seem like a rock star who once used to cook.
It's not like he was pretending to be something. He billed himself as a writer who wants to be a rockstar who used to cook. People just liked that.
The original research was shown to be BS because it was done by the usual wooly minded rigour challenged phycology researchers.
That article you linked says that the conclusion that children who passed the marshmallow test will go on to be more successful later in life is rubbish. I agree with what it says.
It doesn't say that the conclusion that the test indicates some complex thought processes is wrong. Nobody seems to be claiming that the cuttlefish who pass their version of the marshmallow test will go on to make six figures or anything. Just that they are clever. That seems in line with other anecdotal evidence about cuttlefish.
Light passes through these patterned nanostructures, which look like millions of circles with differing diameters at the microscopic level.
Anyway, the tax will just get put on the employees and the customers.
As is often pointed out, we aren't the customers of these platforms. Finally, i get something out of being the product!
fortune: No such file or directory