Yeah, only the "most" important fear of someone matters. ICU patients losing their life tomorrow can be raped with impunity, because rape is not their most important fear. You are revealing the layers of your own depravity.
Yeah, you don't have internet and you live in Africa, and the neighborhood who know the kids don't read the US / Europe news - this means you are abusing the kids.
Got it, you are disgusting.
So? When did it become illegal to not appear in public? Or in your twisted psyche it's ok to abuse kids who don't appear in public?
Yes, only 8 billion people have to be searched. All within a 20,000 mile distance. Piece of cake.
Not really. They had access to adult porn, fully clothed children, and medical literature. This is enough information to create child porn convincing enough to be disgusting.
When photosynthesis started, the atmosphere had much more CO2, and had very little oxygen. The plants changed the very nature of our atmosphere, from neutral / reducing atmosphere to an oxidative atmosphere. Many species were killed off, the biosphere changed almost completely.
All just for their selfish needs to consume CO2.
Nope, a human would anticipate someone tailgating a large vehicle. So they wouldn't need to brake in the first place, they'll just accelerate late.
Your assumption that a typical software company is ever "mature" in the sense of not needing many software developers is ridiculous. Just an example, Microsoft employs thousands of times more software developers now when it is "mature" in normal ways, than when it was releasing its software for the first time.
Fun! I see that even you don't remember what they are anymore.
Wrong. I remember the points, for an educated person all of them are summarised in my first post in this thread, but you couldn't understand the first concept in it for so long.
you apparently believe that Socialism is superior to Capitalism.
This is also wrong. So you enjoy building and smashing strawmen, you don't need anyone else.
These are not the 3 points. We are far from there now due to the long route needed to educate you on the first point.
Some people are difficult to educate, that's fine. I didn't sidestep, you were unable to progress beyond point 1 of a 3 point chapter.
So my suspicion was correct, you don't know the meaning of "by themselves". It is surely poor reading comprehension (which includes basic knowledge of the language in question). Your logic might be ok for all I know.
Free tutorial :
https://www.merriam-webster.co...
https://dictionary.cambridge.o...
My beef is that you are attributing *all* goodness at any company
This I attribute to your poor reading comprehension. Or poor logic. Or both.
The unions not only brought about direct actions on the employers they work for, they also brought about legislation, regulation and awareness for employees of other employers. The only way to evaluate the effect of companies alone without the role of unions, is to look at an era where unions didn't exist.
Just because your employer didn't have unions, did the laws of minimum wage, overtime, 401k matching or the like in the jurisdiction not apply ? Did employees become unaware of the possibility of unions just because the specific employer didn't have unions ? Did they stop having options to move to employers with unions ?
You couldn't understand the obvious timeline of my examples. When companies started to exist, and when unions came into being.
If you think the system is working, ask someone who's waiting for a prompt.
