Welcome to the new reality of book spam.
The book you read may not actually be written or contain any new information but instead be a generated piece of fluff to grab your attention and money.
Let's hope it at least stays in the non-informational genres.

You think that, because an algorithm that looks at statistical use of words can string together a likely sequence of words based on another input sequence, it understands the actual question and/or the subject matter? Wow. You are in for a surprise.

The experience you buy into and are super hyped over will change to something you may not be interested in at any moment.
Hopefully you can shrug off the loss and switch to another game when your favorite gamemode is removed to push players over to the new crap.

With salespeople using AI to send messages, the armsrace is on.
I'll even make the AI respond and ask for very disturbing details. Let's see if we can't make em drown in "potential sales".

Teaching the pitfalls of plagiarism and downsides of highly derivative work would be a great outcome but just plagiarism and highly derivative work will most likely be the result.

So, does this cover the new plant protein based meat substitutes?
They need a lot of processing to turn peas into "red meat"...

IANAL, but just need to mention; Ai does not hold copyrights.
As a performer you would still have some protection but the works would not be copyrighted.

There are pros and cons to encrypting the chatter, but it boils down to trust.
In many other countrys it is already encrypted, and police is required to post a datastream of events to media and private citizen alike. Because the police in these countrys have trust, and continually earn this trust, this works.

This blocks criminals from getting live info on exactly what police are doing and as such reduce the risk to the police of their information being misused.
In US, and especially NY, the police does not have the public trust. They prove time and time again that they do not deserve this trust. They can not be trusted to divulge information on a different channel about events for public information and safety. Prove me wrong, please.

Or just so "power hungry". After all, powerful means it does something with all that power. That isn't required to trip the grid. A big iron bar across a transformer will do that and it can't compute at all.

You forget the theories of the missing enzymes allowing for breakdown of lignin in trees/plants. In essence there may have been a time when they grew like crazy and when they died, there was no way to break them down, letting them create very thick "layers" of biomass. Now this won't happen as the biomass is broken down instead of turning into oil/coal. Brown coal which has not been fully converted yet is called Lignite btw...

We have been forced to buy computers with trusted platform support, and the cpu's have ability to run code encrypted to only be decodeable on our cpu to allow for direct supplier-to-cpu code security, and executing in a protected and encrypted environment so as to safeguard against memory access by external parties. This has been in place for years now, yet I have not seen anything that uses this other than attempts to prevent users from running Linux on their laptops.

Are these tools too complex to use?
Are the costs involved too high?
Licencing?

Video clearly states it is a trasducer array and backed by a gel sandwich and adhesive that can hold it in place for up to 48 hours. It still beats a nurse holding the wand for long periods of time so is a great idea!

If this comes from the person who decided posting a creepy mail about what is in my email every morning or at start of workweek was a good idea then has no clue. And to say "how about scheduling focus time to be more spontaneous and creative" is driving me up the wall in a dynamic and insightull way is putting it mildly.

This was discovered ago. It was even confirmed with rat experiments and using data from Chinese municipalities that have tracked cause of death for ages. They had found that over a certain % meat protein in the diet, your risk of cancer increases dramatically. Turns out, normal diet is well below this limit, but modern over-indulgence goes past it by quite some margin, thus these "diets" have a benefit by simply getting below the limit again. It's time to study the why people, stop repeating the same research. Find out why this is, we know that it is.

I realize that /. hates unicode now as um was what was written and it was autocorrected to 'mu'm (Thanks Chrome).
And yes, um not m please :)