Is "most beloved dress shirts" something normal people actually have? Sounds absolutely ridiculous. Using computer vision to determine measurements would be great, but you don't need to clone an existing shirt. That's just silly. Are these even going to be cheaper if they're custom manufactured for each user?

These devices haven't been "phones" for a long time. The "Phone" is but one app on my mobile computer. I like how in The Expanse they just call them "hand terminals." Mobile device or mobile computer works just as well. Let's just remove "phone" from the vocabulary, please?

Does this mean we have vast seas of liquid hydrogen at the bottom of our oceans? By what chemical process is the oxygen extracted from the water?

Hopefully now they'll stop artificially preventing their Amazon Video app *for Android* from working on non-Amazon Android devices. I've told them many times that I would not even consider becoming a Prime member until they fixed this nonsense and supported Android TV without any poorly-performing hacks.

The FCC is not the Trump Administration, or even a part of it. Words have meanings.

Regardless, this is yet another very sad day for this country.

Is it still a Cable Company if it delivers video streams over fiber instead of coax? Is it about the physical cable line running to your home, or the content? I wouldn't consider a company that provides DSL a cable company, but obviously they still use a cable, and one can receive IPTV over that connection. The terminology is extremely poor here.

I could never imagine going back to programmed video streams like TV, let alone one that had commercials. Apparently T-Mobile has identified a market for it. Pretty much older people or those who care about sporting events. Still, I would like to see it go away sooner, rather than later, and this is going in the wrong direction.

The real question is why it is seemingly obsessed with objectifying women and sexualizing young girls in particular. It is disgusting.

While I do use Chromium on occasion, Firefox has been my "tried and true browser of choice" since it was called Phoenix. I was initially quite annoyed about the deprecation of legacy XUL add-ons, however throughout the FF57 beta period, WebExtensions have popped up to meet just about all of my needs, and the performance improvements have been outstanding. Firefox continues to be the de-facto standard browser for the web. It is an indispensable tool, and a wonderful model for the entire software industry. Mozilla continues to lead the way in pushing for web standards.

My biggest gripe is the adoption of proprietary DRM technologies in Firefox (and every other browser). These technologies need to go. The web must remain open.

Does anyone actually *want* to use a pen/stylus to write things on a screen? They're great for artists, but obviously that's not what digital ink displays are designed for. I recently had to hand-write just a few paragraphs for an exercise at work and it was so foreign and awful, my hand actually cramped up. Why would anyone want to manually hand-write things? It just makes no sense. A foldable keyboard that is actually nice to use would be far, far more useful.

No, they don't. You obviously need to spend a bit more time over at https://f-droid.org/.

People who give an advertising app like Facebook permission to record audio from their microphone *deserve* to be listened-in on. Services like this should only be accessed in a sandboxed, open-source web browser that gives you full control of what information they have access to.

https://www.clamav.net/

The fact is, researching new viruses and maintaining up-to-date signatures requires constant work, which means the need for paid employees. This is really something that should be a collaboration between all the governments of the world and provide for free, thus facilitating far greater FOSS anti-virus solutions. As it is, it's just not something that's interesting enough for anyone to want to do as a hobby. Add to that the fact that those of us running FOSS operating systems don't use anti-virus software in the first place. I think the last time I had an anti-virus application running on my own machine was in the late 90s.

There is absolutely no circumstance in which a decent human being would use the word "gay" to mean "some degree of bad." It is a clear and direct indicator that the person using it is an asshole. Without the sexual orientation definition, the word means happy. That's it. It has NEVER meant "bad' or negative in any way. Those who use it in a negative way are directly attacking homosexuals. This is simply a fact. It's exactly the same as how we have turned "nig*er" from simply meaning black to something not just derogatory, but actually violent.

Right, because it's not like we have enough people on this planet or anything...

I'm confused. Isn't the fact that the AI determined this based on human user input simply a reflection of the sad state of our society, and not the AI itself? Surely no one programmed the AI to automatically regard minority attributes as negative. Unless I'm misinterpreting this, Google shouldn't be apologizing. The human race should. The great thing about an AI is that you can easily determine what it really "thinks," unlike human beings which conveniently hide it behind a friendly façade (well, at least they used to before Trumpism took over).