You know, not every bit of software is an app...
Isn't that why it said "and services"? Although...
Etymologically, yes...but it's used (or at least is supposed to be used) to describe small applications downloadable to phones. I noticed it really take hold with Apple's App Store, although its been around longer than that
That usage of the word apps especially "internet apps", web apps etc predates the mobile phone usage. Your reference is just the more recent trend even it if has been used for a while.
- Star Wars uses laser weapons. Any advanced space-race would never use laser weapons as they are readily re-mediated by the use of reflective materials.
Our current understanding of lasers is hardly adequate to apply to the scale and versatility of the laser weaponry used in Star Wars. There are some different mechanics involved in Star Wars blasters, turbo lasers etc that we do not use. Furthermore, the countermeasures you speak of are easily countered and unpractical even by todays standards.
Star Trek uses Phasers (phased energy weapons), which at least sort of makes sense.
Why? Have you been about to demonstrate that there aren't any efficient countermeasures?
- An entire planet existing as a city? This makes no sense from a material logistics point of view, at all.
Neither do many of our cities.
Need I mention the force? Microscopic life forms (midichlorians) giving magical powers to people? It is an interesting plot device, but rooted in any kind of science? No.
It's about as rooted in science as a transporter. The only difference is you dressed up the idea with the phrase magical powers.
since when US=ALL?
It seems like you are just taking the use of the word out of context. If I say "everyone was at my party", it doesn't really mean everyone in existence, especially if the scope is clarified in the sentence after. I assumed that the word "all" wasn't meant to be taken literally or imply that the "US=ALL", but instead meant that the service was no longer invite only.
I wanted to mod you up, but there's no option for "drug induced rambling."
No I think he needs an exorcist.
go fuck yourself and find an actual business model.
So a paid tweet is what I thought it was. Thanks for clearing that up.
Who cares? Pick a different platform folks.
It seems like a lot of people do care. For just about every reason you mentioned. Flash pays some people's bills. iPad meets some people's desires and needs but has some glaring inconveniences, while alternatives might not even com close. Also as a developer you don't want to be strung along only to find that your work is suddenly banned from the platform that you did choose. I'm not saying I disagree with all of Apple's choices but I also wouldn't act like it's of no concern to anyone. Also it's good for consumers and developers alike to let companies like Apple know what they like or at least how their decisions will influence PR. In some rare cases it actually does get them what they want.
You don't use a torrent to grab a three or four meg file: swarming protocols work best for sharing large files.
You don't or you shouldn't? With torrents people generally look for the album many of which are small enough that they aren't even compressed. From there they can download a single track listed in the torrent (bad for the sworm) or just download the whole album and delete the songs they don't want. If the album is well seeded, the benefit of a higher downloads speed and selection is often worth dealing with torrents, even for small files. Then you have the private trackers like jpopsuki that seed singles and package files so you can download them individually.
And once everyone had a replicator - everyone would replicate the newest, coolest, best car.
And nobody would pay for it.
And the people who design cars wouldn't have money to keep designing cars. And all of the advancement and innovation that we've seen since the first car and now would grind to a halt.
Wouldn't it be the opposite? You can replicated the cars but you can't really replicate a service such as making an original design. In addition the materials and cost of designing the car would be greatly reduced by the replicators. Then factor in that the designers will no longer need money to pay for food clothing etc which also applies to their employer and customers giving them more money pay for services and energy. It seems like the designer is the one that would end up with the real job security here. That's not even factoring in the new industries that would spring up as a result.
Software production is assumed to be a line function, but it is run like a staff function. -- Paul Licker