Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Sometimes it works out (Score 1) 116

AirBnB at its best allows people with unused spare rooms to generate an income from that asset

And at its worst it prices residents out of their own city while destroying the local hospitality industry. For every "common person with an unused spare room showing tourists cool local things" there are at least ten faceless investment firms treating them as de-facto hotel rooms you get the honor of cleaning yourself.

Seriously, AirBnB is your shining example of why we shouldn't view tech bros with extreme skepticism?

Want to talk about the rest of the gig economy which only exists by evading decades of hard won labor rights/regulations?

Comment Re:Don't make an emulator of Current Products (Score 1, Informative) 33

Products that are no longer sold can have emulators sold on the open market https://www.amazon.com/mame-ar...

Those products all paid licensing fees to whomever owns the underlying IP. You can find examples where the IP owner decides to be a dick. I'll call out everyone's least favorite, EA, and point out that you can't legally get the SNES version of Sim City on modern hardware via any sales channel that I'm aware of. Of course, there are "gray" options to play it, but you won't find it in the Wii store and there's no (legal) packaged emulator for it on Amazon.

Comment Re:Privacy implications (Score 1) 49

One problem, though, is that it normalizes Chrome sending encrypted data regularly to Google each time a new site is visited, making it more difficult

It's pretty trivial to install your own certificate authority and perform MITM attacks against all encrypted traffic coming from a particular endpoint over which you have control. It's less trivial but still doable to decompile a program and look through the source for hidden processes like you describe. All of which is to say I doubt Google could keep something like you describe a secret for very long, if they were inclined to try it, which seems unlikely. Why risk the bad PR and inevitable lawsuits when the majority of the unwashed masses happily consent to being spied on?

as phishing is an absolute plague right now

It absolutely is. What Google is doing here is no different than how most endpoint protection suites work. They all submit visited websites to a real time authority to check for known pfishing/malware sites. They will block in the moment where possible and retroactively alert the IT team when a visited site is later determined to be bad. I'm assuming Chrome will at least do the first. The second would be trickier while maintaining privacy but would still be doable locally, if the browser can download the database and compare it against its own history.

Comment Re:Happy slaves are the best! (Score 1) 122

To imply that people who every day have the freedom to make a choice to go to work or not and even every minute of the work day have the freedom to make the choice to simply walk off the job (and get paid up through the last minute before they walked off) is dismissive of those who historically suffered from slavery and those, in some countries, who still do. It is, in fact, extremely insulting to such individuals.

You're not wrong to call out the nonsensical equation to slavery as being silly at best and highly offensive at worst....

But where do you see a choice to go to work or not? Did you mistake Amazon's home country for one with a meaningful social safety net? Did I sleep through humanity waking up in the Star Trek utopia where we only work doing the things we love and not to meet our basic needs for food, shelter, healthcare, etc.?

Comment Re:Unreal (Score 5, Interesting) 114

It's insane to think that Boeing doesn't have these controls in place as well.

They used to. Boeing is a case study in what happens when you let Next Quarter MBA assholes run an enterprise. The story of the last few decades of American capitalism has been such assholes hijacking virtually every company of note. It's not enough to be profitable, you have to be MORE profitable than you were last quarter, where you were MORE profitable than the quarter preceding it. That appeases the Wall Street beast, which boosts the stock price, which is all you really care about in the C-Suite since stock options make up the majority of your compensation.

Now, it's obvious to those of us who don't have MBAs that you will eventually reach a point of maximal efficiency/profit where further gains can only come at the expense of safety, worker's rights, product quality, customer satisfaction, or most likely, all of the above and then some. And here we are. To quote John Oliver, "We went to business school. Get on our plane!"

Some additional backstory if you're interested.

Comment Re:CCTV Rention (Score 4, Interesting) 114

Everywhere I've worked where I had involvement with the CCTV systems aimed to keep at least 90 days. I've never heard of 10 days, that seems awfully low, might have made sense in the analog/tape era but digital storage is cheap.

One of my locations is on an accident prone intersection. We get a lot of requests from insurance companies and drivers for footage of accidents. When the requests come from the insurance carriers it's pretty damned rare they make it to us within 30 days. I guess the bureaucracy slows them down. Requests from the drivers involved usually make it to us a lot faster.

Comment Re:This was inevitable... (Score 1) 277

Southwest's boarding process (more specifically, the people who abuse it: looking at you seat savers), lack of codesharing agreements to book you on another airline when things go wrong, point-to-point model, and lack of first/business class create their own problems you don't have to endure with other airlines.

At the end of the day pick your poison. I don't hate Southwest but I prefer Alaska.

Reserve your real pity for the chumps flying Spirit, lol. I have an image in my head of a decompression event on Spirit and credit card readers falling out of the ceiling instead of O2 masks. "In the event of a cabin decompression, please pay for your oxygen before paying for your seat mate's."

Comment Re:Geez, how much STUFF do you need? (Score 1) 277

If you can avoid having to check in luggage, this saves me 30-60mins queuing at bag-drop upon departure

You must be the single unluckiest traveler ever my friend. :)

I fly at least as often as you, judging by your other posts, and even on coach/low cost seats/airlines, it's pretty damned rare to wait 30 minutes for bag-drop. It's usually less than 10 minutes. Even at SEA.

In Seattle it's because there's a long wait for baggage, and after that you go through customs and immigration, so by the time you get your baggage then the customs-and-immigration queue is already awfully long.

If you fly internationally as often as you say, why don't you invest $100 into Global Entry? I used to go through JFK all the time, I promise you that customs queue is worse than SEA, but who cares if you have Global Entry? The $100 pays for itself the first time you bypass that queue.

Comment Re:Geez, how much STUFF do you need? (Score 1) 277

Why wouldn't you go buy new stuff in that scenario? The airline has an allowance for exactly this contingency. I've flown hundreds of times over the course of my life and exactly ONE time my checked bag went missing. Why would I load up my carry-on for a scenario that has happened to me less than 1% of the time?

Comment Re:Geez, how much STUFF do you need? (Score 1) 277

I fly into Seattle about 8x a year, half the time with baggage (family travel), half the time without (solo business travel). Waiting for baggage adds an average of 45mins.

I fly into SEA at least as often and I cannot recall ever waiting more than 30 minutes. It's usually closer to 15. Exit the aircraft, find a bathroom, refill my water bottle, walk to baggage claim, and more often than not bags are already coming out. That is my default experience at nearly all airports. The only bad time I ever had was at PIT, on an Alaska Airlines flight, 90+ minute wait. My supposition there is it's such an infrequent destination for Alaska they outsource the baggage job to someone else. There was no on-site Alaska representative to speak to and the 800 number was clueless. *shrug*

Slashdot Top Deals

THEGODDESSOFTHENETHASTWISTINGFINGERSANDHERVOICEISLIKEAJAVELININTHENIGHTDUDE

Working...