Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Link, and summary... (Score 1) 119

Link to the Boeing announcement

Quick summary

  • CEO stepping down, but not until the end of the year
  • Chairman of the board serving out his term, which ends in May
  • Head of "Boeing Commercial Airplanes" is retiring immediately

There's a link to a letter from the CEO, but both my ad-blocker and my pi-hole object to it. Great job, Boeing, where the heck did you put that letter? Right next to the door-plug removal documentation?

None of this matters, because they're being replaced by people within Boeing that worked very close with them. It's not like they're bringing in fresh blood. This is the appearance of "doing something".

Comment Re:Not the issue (Score 1) 119

Boeing's problems have very little to do with DEI. The primary problems came from when Boeing merged with the then struggling McDonnel Douglas and somehow the MD management ended up almost completely in charge. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/01/boeing-737-max-corporate-culture/677120/. They even moved the corporate headquarters to be deliberately further away from the factories and engineers. So what was once one of the most engineering focused of businesses became completely business focused.

Oh not this again.

From the article:

But in 1997, Boeing bought another aircraft manufacturer, McDonnell Douglas, in what turned out to be a kind of reverse acquisition—executives from McDonnell Douglas ended up dominating and remaking Boeing. They turned it from a company that was relentlessly focused on product to one more focused on profit.

As if Boeing wasn't ruthlessly focused on profit before the merger, like all large companies.

Most of this whining comes from legacy Boeing employees that lost out come promotion time to MD employees in the merger. The legacy Boeing people have been the source for many of these articles, like your source in the Atlantic, and they've been out of the company a long time. Most of them have no idea what's going on inside today.

Boeing's problem, like all other large corporations, is the culture of outsourcing. This is not unique to Boeing in any way. Witness the horrific problems Lockheed Martin has in producing the F-35, where an audit found that some aircraft had parts installed backwards. Lockheed spread production out across most of the Continental US, helping to ensure political survival of the project, but raising the cost and spreading production out among an unmanageable web of subcontractors.

Every large corporation in the world has these problems because every large corporation in the world is now essentially just a logo slapped on a product assembled by a third party in a low cost country or area. Apple's reputation for quality is due to their zeal in controlling every step in production, and even they are slipping here.

Ask any appliance repairman how much you should spend on a new refrigerator, washing machine, etc. He'll tell you to buy cheap, because none of it lasts anymore anyway. We all have that grandpa or uncle with a refrigerator in his garage that's been running for 50 years. And yet I can't get one to last more than 6 or 7 these days. The issue of quality is worldwide, and Airbus has them too, they're just not in the news as much. Airbus just settled a lawsuit last year over fuselage quality issues.

Comment Re:Affordable? (Score 2) 78

From the article:

This 900-square-foot home will cost roughly $300,000 - about $100,000 less than a similar custom-built home...
It will rent for $2,000 a month.

I understand that this is a Proof of Concept, but I have to wonder if anyone involved has an idea as to what "affordable" means.

There's no way in hell that over a quarter-million bucks for a pre-fab home is reasonable. This experiment is gonna fall on its face.

Comment Re:Stupid solution, move jobs elsewhere (Score 2) 78

The real problem is over-crowding. Everyone is forced to live in the same place, which is driving land prices up and up. Instead force jobs to move elsewhere, that will bring down the demand for the same piece of land.

No one is forced to live in expensive areas. Those areas are expensive because of the sheer number of people that WANT to live there. They could, in most cases, live and work in cheaper areas, and have a nice house and job. But New York is New York Expensive because legions of twentysomethings have a romantic itch to live that "New York Experience", and so the city is constantly stuffed with people trying to get in.

Everyone can't have a pony. And everyone can't live in the most expensive areas.

Comment Re:I don't get Texas priorities (Score 0) 292

With all problems at the border, in public education, debt and so on they chose to take on porn sites? Why?

Your state government can't do more than one thing at a time?

And speaking of the Border, Texas IS trying to do something about it, all while the Biden Administration sues them, trying to prevent them from doing anything about the border.

Comment Re: They can learn to mine coal (Score 0) 124

Do not look down on trades. If you're motivated and smart you can do as good if not better there than in most other career paths you can mention, and their job security moving forward is absolutely guaranteed.

I am in no way looking down on the trades. I'm an admirer of men that do such jobs, and I consider those jobs both highly important, and well-deserving of high compensation. My point is that some people are not cut out for various fields, and while people doing trades are in no way "dumb" (in addition to skill, many trades require a lot of knowledge and more than a good bit of practical math that average people would probably struggle with), they're still not cut out to do things like software development, which takes different mental talents.

Bottom line.... just as that, contrary to what we tell our kids, not everyone can be an astronaut or President, not everyone is cut out for CS or high-knowledge white collar jobs. And that's the larger problem: the media, politicians, high schools, etc, seem to think that CS and software development IS something that anyone can do, that it IS a field where any coal miner can learn to be a programmer with a few weeks of classes.

Comment Re:They can learn to mine coal (Score 4, Insightful) 124

Learn what in trade school? IT? Then maybe. In California, a plumber's median income is 50k. A construction worker .. 45k. A mechanic about the same. Yes you can earn into the six figures as a construction worker once you get good at it and have experience etc. A software engineer's median income is $130k. And you can get good at that too and earn more.

A software engineer... not just a basic programmer, but a real, full-stack software developer... isn't comparable to a plumber or concrete tech, though. So the comparison is a bit unfair. Those are skilled jobs, but a full-stack developer with a CS degree is more like a CPA, a white collar professional. One of the reasons that CPA and devs make the kind of money they do is that most people don't have the cranial firepower to do them... or there'd be more devs and CPA's. Which is also another reason why it's batshit silly to require CS to graduate high school. It's part of the same mindset that said "every child is an undiscovered math prodigy" that we saw in the 80's and 90's. Again, it's just not the case.

We have a LOT of people in IT that shouldn't be (just like college), and to a great extent they're in the field because guidance counselors and parents seem to think that anyone can be a network admin, or sysadmin, or dev, etc. And many would be better suited learning welding, plumbing, or some other skill.

Comment Re:Becaue (Score 1) 94

How on earth would it pay out more than it takes in? That's impossible. You don't actually want a payout. Do you not understand the point of insurance?

Some insurance sectors don't make their profits on premiums. They make money by investing premium income somewhere else, and that money puts them in the black. This is especially the case in the reinsurance market.

Comment Re:Crank physics (Score 1) 243

Ugh. Don't give this stuff exposure. "Tired light" has a similar status in physics as "Electric universe"and other cranky theories.

"Cranky" and "Brilliant" are a thin line in physics. Remember, we have people that swear the universe is made up of a bunch of vibrating strings. They can't prove it, but they're held in high esteem anyway.

Comment Re: Crank physics (Score 1) 243

Dark matter is also a new explanation to make observations fit theory. You can't claim "we know" how things work. We don't know anything, we can only check if a model fits with data or not.

The whole notion of Dark Matter struck me as a kludge because cosmologists had what they thought was a beautiful model, and just couldn't quite deal with the numbers not adding up.

Essentially, "the math doesn't work, so we'll insert X here, and hey look, now it works" without having to actually prove X exists.

Comment Re:VPN? (Score 1) 37

The ideal is a seedbox somewhere, where one can have all that stuff done offshore, then fetch your goodies via SFTP.

I was doing that for a bit, but then I mashed Transmission and a VPN client together in one container and started using that. Files land directly on my home server, while the VPN endpoint is in a country that takes a more relaxed view of "sailing the high seas." Keeping this URL in your BitTorrent client allows you to quickly verify that the VPN is doing its job.

Comment Re:When to send a dickpic (Score 1) 159

Exactly. You don't want a pic like that floating around on the internet. What if you run for public office one day?

If we're talking American politics, that isn't exactly the career killer it once was. I don't think we're too far off from politicians including links to their OnlyFans.

We'll have a stripper, prostitute (real, not metaphorical), or porn star in a federal or major state office in the next decade. I'll guarantee it. Probably out of Vegas or Southern California. And yes, OnlyFans will be involved.

Slashdot Top Deals

Understanding is always the understanding of a smaller problem in relation to a bigger problem. -- P.D. Ouspensky

Working...