Assume a "Coruscant Earth"- an Earth where *all* potential space is used, both land and sea, for a combination of food production and living space. Use the Permaculture formula of one acre per person of absorbed sunlight, with 100% conversion to whatever mass/energy combination we need to create food and energy of one person to live.

Earth is about 510,000,000 km^2. There are 247 acres in a square kilometer. This yields (with much better technology than we currently have, of course) a maximum population of 125.97 billion people, each owning one acre.

Of course various contracts would increase efficiency and there'd be the normal range of capitalism creating rich and poor in the long run, but at least there'd be an agreed upon base lifestyle- even if it's only a kayak with a net anchored at sea or a tent on land.

And other interesting conspiracy theories from the land of cultural evolutionary theory of Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying can be found at https://youtu.be/ipiT5noHWk4

As we are beginning to see divisions appear that are destructive to the Constitutional Representative Republic known as the United States of America, with Democrats finding new ways to cheat at democracy and the promotion of mob rule; combined with the massive increase in information technology we've seen over the past 40 years, I propose the following changes to governmental budget processes:

1. Break up the budget into line items

2. Forward those line items to taxing authorities at every level- city, county, state, and federal

3. Allow individual tax payers to fill out an extra-long-form return, with the caveat that by doing so you agree to allocate every penny of your taxes to something that makes a difference in your life or the lives of people you care about.

Doing so would reduce the incentive of the rich to cheat on their taxes (because by paying more taxes, they can regain some small amount of power to fund government programs directly) while enhancing even the common person's ability to influence government (truly voting with dollars for programs that help your family and your friends).

People who choose not to fill out the extra long form, have their taxes applied to the general fund which provides matching grants to those programs that either nobody else will fund (one FTE if your program attracted $0 this year, whose job it will be to promote the program next year; otherwise grants will be some percentage of dollars raised).

This spring, the Supreme Court of the United States, will once again be considering a case on USC 42 Title 42 Chapter 6A Subchapter XIX

Despite many changes to the law over the past century, the Biden Vaccine Mandate will be the first challenge to this law since Jacobson vs Massachusetts (1905), in which a State's Right to force vaccination upon a private individual or a group of individuals was established.

As the major Web 2.0 sites are now censoring discussion on this issue, I'm opening up for discussion- Did Congress intend this to become a power of the federal government?

We send our children to school to learn from people who have expertise in that
 
No we don't. We send our children to school *because we are required by law to do so and for the free babysitting*.

Experts, as a rule, are awful.

Take Ibram X Kendi, for instance. The Doctor of Anti-racism, or is he? I would argue that everything he has ever proposed as anti-racism, would produce *unequal results* along racial lines, and thus is racist *by his own definition*.

Just as the 1619 project, by the very nature of its generalized racial genetic stereotyping, produces *unequal results* along racial lines, and thus is racist by the very definition of the anti-racists.

Perhaps Thomas Sowell is right instead, and no two cultures were ever meant to be equal to begin with.

If you have disagreed with me on Critical Race Theory being a step backwards, if you don't believe we can do better than the segregation of anti-racism, then may I present to you Virginia's new post-racist Republican Government

Makes you wish for a twit who could write covefe on twitter again.

https://youtu.be/YmUAZQOAA6c

But Truth over Facts, and you ain't black if you didn't vote for Biden.

I've long said that Climate Change requires Adaptation, not destruction of our economy and our way of life.

I've said that since 2004, when we crossed the Tundra Methane Threshold and the most influential greenhouse gas today became a positive feedback loop, accounting for 95% of all greenhouse gases released now and likely in the near future.

Now Senator Dan Crenshaw shows just how dishonest the Green New Deal is in relation to an adaptation vs cancelation strategy.

Just Remember, if an Sicilian Immigrant encouraged rioting every time a criminal was killed by the police, and then sold signs to small businesses to put in their windows to prevent damage, RICO laws would be brought to bear on the protection racket.

Maybe it's time we judged people on the content of their character, rather than the color of their skin.

If you watch no other part of this video, skip to 18 minutes in for a discussion with a Google tech about Android privacy violation phone location tracking.

https://youtu.be/VQ8JHSOggaw

An explanation of why the world of finance is now controlled by liberal authoritarians:

https://youtu.be/84oLmJqj-0I

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9oyt2xIIwg&t=10s

Just leave us alone.

What motivates liberals and progressives:
1. Addiction to change for fiscal profit
2. Addiction to change for sexual abuse
3. Addiction to change for new drugs

But the natural divide on the other side is CONSERVATIVES- the need to conserve. Change addicts have many things they want to change. But Change Skeptics have nowhere to go in the storm.

https://youtu.be/QdpSgEQKVNE

IF you are in LA, please watch this video.

If you are in LA and have a large vehicle and time, call your local funeral director and volunteer for corpse safety training and picking up corpses.

If you are in LA and have either a refrigerated truck or large freezer space- EVEN BETTER.

anybody else have a successful troll, and then find a limit on hitting "reply to this"?

The message I'm getting from slashdot is "You have used this resource too often, try again later"

It is extremely true, and I still hold it to be true, that for social justice to occur the excessive wealth of the rich needs to belong to the poor.

  But how do they belong to the poor?

I say the principle way they belong to the poor is as wages. That the wealthy man with excess, has a duty to invest that excess in businesses that create jobs. Not create return on investment, though doing so enables more excess and thus more job creation, but rather create living wage jobs, which the poor can profit from.
The church does not seem to have much experience in this, sadly. Employment with the church is invariably lower than a living wage and unprofitable.
I still have to wonder if Eisenhower was smarter than Kennedy on this, however.