Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
The Courts

Submission + - Child Porn Viewer Told to Pay $200000 Restitution->

Brian Ribbon writes: "In a landmark ruling, a man convicted of possessing and distributing child pornography has been forced to pay $200000 to a subject of images which he possessed but did not distribute. The lawyer of a woman who was once depicted in some of the images claimed that "the victim is a victim of sexual exploitation caused by this defendant," despite the fact that the defendant downloaded the images almost ten years after they had been produced. Ernie Allen, of the state-funded advocacy organisation NCMEC, argued that "every time they are downloaded, every time they are distributed, the victim in that image is revictimised"."
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Child Porn Viewer Told to Pay $200000 Restitution

Comments Filter:

You are in a maze of little twisting passages, all different.

Working...