Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×
Databases

+ - Is the One-Size-Fits-All Database Dead?

Submitted by
jlbrown
jlbrown writes "In a new benchmarking paper (http://nms.csail.mit.edu/~stavros/pubs/osfa.pdf), MIT professor Mike Stonebraker and colleagues demonstrate that specialized databases can have dramatic performance advantages (factor of 10 or higher) over traditional databases in four areas: text processing, data warehousing, stream processing, and scientific and intelligence applications. The paper includes some interesting "apples to apples" performance comparisons between commercial implementations of specialized architectures and relational databases in two areas: data warehousing and stream processing.

From the paper: 'A single code line will succeed whenever the intended customer base is reasonably uniform in their feature and query requirements. One can easily argue this uniformity for business data processing. However, in the last quarter century, a collection of new markets with new requirements has arisen. In addition, the relentless advance of technology has a tendency to change the optimization
tactics from time to time.'"

Professional wrestling: ballet for the common man.

Working...