Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

+ - $3000 GeForce GTX TITAN Z Tested, Less Perf than $1500 R9 295X2->

Submitted by Vigile
Vigile (99919) writes "NVIDIA announced its latest dual-GPU flagship card, the GeForce GTX Titan Z, at the GPU Technology Conference in late March with a staggering price point of $2999. Since that time, AMD announced and released the Radeon R9 295X2, its own dual-GPU card with a price tag of $1499. PC Perspective finally put the GTX Titan Z to the test and found that from a PC gamers view, the card is way overpriced for the performance it offers. At both 2560x1440 and 3840x2160 (4K) the R9 295X2 offered higher and more consistent frame rates sometimes by as much as 30%. The AMD card also only takes up two slots (though it does have a water cooling radiator to worry about) while the NVIDIA GTX Titan Z is a three-slot design. The Titan Z is quieter and uses much less power, but gamers considering a $1500 or $3000 graphics card selection are likely not overly concerned with power efficiency."
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

$3000 GeForce GTX TITAN Z Tested, Less Perf than $1500 R9 295X2

Comments Filter:

Long computations which yield zero are probably all for naught.

Working...