Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

+ - Could Slashdot (Or Any Other Company) Sue a Spy Agency Like GCHQ or NSA?->

Submitted by Nerval's Lobster
Nerval's Lobster (2598977) writes "When the GCHQ agency (Britain’s equivalent of the National Security Agency) reportedly decided to infiltrate the IT network of Belgian telecommunications firm Belgacom, it relied on a sophisticated version of a man-in-the-middle attack, in which it directed its targets' computers to fake, malware-riddled versions of Slashdot and LinkedIn. If the attack could be proven without a doubt, would the GCHQ—or any similar spy agency engaging in the same sort of behavior—be liable for violating trademarks or copyrights, since a key part of its attack would necessitate the appropriation of intellectual property such as logos and content? We asked someone from the Electronic Frontier Foundation about that, and received a somewhat dispiriting answer. “From a trademark perspective, if a company uses another company’s marks/logos to deceive, there may be a trademark claim,” said Corynne McSherry, the EFF’s Intellectual Property Director. “But it’s complicated a bit by two problems: (1) the fact that while there may be confusion, it’s not necessarily related to the actual purchase of any goods and services; and (2) multiple TM laws are in play here—for example UK trademark law may have different exceptions and limitations.” McSherry also addressed other issues, including governments' doctrine of sovereign immunity."
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Could Slashdot (Or Any Other Company) Sue a Spy Agency Like GCHQ or NSA?

Comments Filter:

Behind every great computer sits a skinny little geek.

Working...