Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

+ - Weak statistical standards implicated in scientific irreproducibility-> 1

Submitted by ananyo
ananyo (2519492) writes "The plague of non-reproducibility in science may be mostly due to scientists’ use of weak statistical tests, as shown by an innovative method developed by statistician Valen Johnson, at Texas A&M University. Johnson found that a P value of 0.05 or less — commonly considered evidence in support of a hypothesis in many fields including social science — still meant that as many as 17–25% of such findings are probably false. He advocates for scientists to use more stringent P values of 0.005 or less to support their findings, and thinks that the use of the 0.05 standard might account for most of the problem of non-reproducibility in science — even more than other issues, such as biases and scientific misconduct."
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Weak statistical standards implicated in scientific irreproducibility

Comments Filter:
  • commonly considered evidence in support of a hypothesis in many fields including social science

    Note, how the above wording (emphasis mine) suggests, the weak methods used in many fields — social science among them.

    The TFA, however, is different:

    commonly considered evidence in support of a hypothesis in fields such as social science

    The article, obviously, singles-out "social science" in particular... Why would the submitter seek to spin the wording to soften the blow against "social science"?

The most delightful day after the one on which you buy a cottage in the country is the one on which you resell it. -- J. Brecheux

Working...