Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

+ - Error free genome editing made possible by breakthrough.-> 4

Submitted by funky_vibes
funky_vibes (664942) writes "The method, which is being called "Crispr" has been described as "jaw-dropping" by one Nobel scientist, and has stirred up intense excitement among DNA experts around the world.
A pre-programmed RNA molecule is inserted into the body of the organism. Using a special enzyme called CAS9 it will attach and cut the target DNA, whilst inserting data in between. It can be used for both adding and subtracting DNA at any chosen point.
The scientists also claim that the method causes no errors at the insertion points.

What will this new breakthrough be used for first? Penis or breast enlargement? You decide."

Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Error free genome editing made possible by breakthrough.

Comments Filter:
  • I'm voting for one penis enhancement,just for proof of concept, followed by as many breast enhancements as are requested.
  • TFA frets about the "danger of designer babies" — and mentions, that the technique is already banned in Britain for fear of such babies appearing.

    What, exactly, is wrong with designer children? Is it just the class-warfare nonsense all over again — the envious thought of "the rich" improving their offspring even before birth, while the poor remain at the 21st-century level — or is there more to it?

    • It's a hard question to answer.
      But I believe the threat of designer babies was in a theoretical world where parents are able to design babies, but there still isn't a method to correct any kind of mistake retroactively. The child would be at the mercy of their parents whim for the rest of their life.
      Seems to be a non-issue with Crispr since the child could later just edit themselves back.

      How much this kind of stuff is going to cost, is another problem. I believe that this kind of therapy, because of immense

      • by mi (197448)

        The child would be at the mercy of their parents whim for the rest of their life.

        Not much different from the current state of affairs, is it — the childhood treatment (by educators and, especially, parents) determines a lot about adults.

        I believe that this kind of therapy, because of immense popularity, will quickly hit a hard resource constraint problem.

        Does not seem like the procedure is particularly resource-intensive... Not any more so, than, say, vaccination — and less so, than appendix-r

With all the fancy scientists in the world, why can't they just once build a nuclear balm?

Working...