Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


+ - Full storage virtualization and tiering - possible with today's software?->

Submitted by Anonymous Coward
An anonymous reader writes "What have fellow slashdotters used to virtualiza storage for massive applications, with small sets of hot data, and a lot of cold data?
We are looking a relatively inexpensive way to do this (per TiB) and use it to provide virtual system images, and would like to independently couple together many sources (small or big storage nodes, individual disks or arrays) and types (SATA, SAS, SSD) to a pool from which to provide the virtual images reliably without 67%+ wasted for redundancy, and good performance for hot data (automatic block based tiering). Currently we use individual storage nodes with md raid and tried various caches (flashcache, l2arc, eio etc.) and now tiering.
ZFS didn't work at all for us due to it being designed for single to few tenants sequential IO, not random."

Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Full storage virtualization and tiering - possible with today's software?

Comments Filter:

Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (7) Well, it's an excellent idea, but it would make the compilers too hard to write.