Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

+ - Ed Felten: Why Email Services Should be Court-Order Resistant->

Submitted by Jah-Wren Ryel
Jah-Wren Ryel writes: Commentators on the Lavabit case, including the judge himself, have criticized Lavabit for designing its system in a way that resisted court-ordered access to user data. They ask: If court orders are legitimate, why should we allow engineers to design services that protect users against court-ordered access?

The answer is simple but subtle: There are good reasons to protect against insider attacks, and a court order is an insider attack.

Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Ed Felten: Why Email Services Should be Court-Order Resistant

Comments Filter:

"Morality is one thing. Ratings are everything." - A Network 23 executive on "Max Headroom"

Working...