Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


+ - 45% of U.S. Jobs Vulnerable to Automation-> 2

Submitted by Anonymous Coward
An anonymous reader writes "A new report out of Oxford has found that the next 20 years will see 45% of America's workforce replaced by computerized automation. 'The authors believe this takeover will happen in two stages. First, computers will start replacing people in especially vulnerable fields like transportation/logistics, production labor, and administrative support. Jobs in services, sales, and construction may also be lost in this first stage. Then, the rate of replacement will slow down due to bottlenecks in harder-to-automate fields such engineering. This "technological plateau" will be followed by a second wave of computerization, dependent upon the development of good artificial intelligence. This could next put jobs in management, science and engineering, and the arts at risk.' 45% is a big number. Politicians have been yelling themselves hoarse over the jobs issue in this country for the past few years, and the current situation isn't anywhere near as bad. At what point will we start seeing legislation forbidding the automation of certain industries?"
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

45% of U.S. Jobs Vulnerable to Automation

Comments Filter:
  • Time to reduce your population by the same 45%.

  • I used to think like this, but that was before I had a job at a major mail order prescription company.
    Middle management tried to impress upper management by purchasing a one million dollar automated packing system, in theory it could do thousands of orders a day.
    Far outclassing a single human packer at a packing station.
    It only did that occasionally, why?
    It was a dumb automated machine, ONE little deviation and it stopped working.
    This was on top of other stuff on it not working like printing the wrong order

If you steal from one author it's plagiarism; if you steal from many it's research. -- Wilson Mizner