Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

+ - How the United Nations Started a Cholera Epidemic in Haiti 3

Submitted by Hugh Pickens DOT Com
Hugh Pickens DOT Com (2995471) writes "Celso Perez and Muneer Ahmad write in The Atlantic that despite evidence to the contrary, for nearly three years, the United Nations has categorically denied that it introduced cholera into Haiti after the country suffered a devastating earthquake in 2010. Since then, cholera has killed more than 8,000 people and infected more than 600,000, creating an ongoing epidemic. According to extensive documentation by scientists and journalists, peacekeeping troops belonging to the UN Stabilization Mission in Haiti (MINUSTAH) inadvertently but negligently brought cholera into the country several months after the January 2010 earthquake. That October, troops from Nepal carrying the disease were stationed at a military base near the town of Méyè. Because of inadequate water and sanitation facilities at the base, cholera-infected sewage contaminated the Artibonite River, the largest river in Haiti and one the country's main water sources. As locals consumed the contaminated water, cholera spread across the country. Absent from Haiti for over a century, cholera is now projected to plague the country for at least another decade. "By refusing to acknowledge responsibility, the United Nations jeopardizes its standing and moral authority in Haiti and in other countries where its personnel are deployed," writes the Washington Post Editorial Board adding that without "speaking frankly about its own responsibility for introducing cholera to Haiti, the organization does a disservice to Haiti and Haitians, who deserve better.""
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

How the United Nations Started a Cholera Epidemic in Haiti

Comments Filter:
  • Why wouldn't the UN just say it's possible? Its employees used the toilets assigned to them. If Haiti connected those toilets to one of their main drinking sources then that is on them. It's sad, yes. Finger pointing is worthless in this case.

The meat is rotten, but the booze is holding out. Computer translation of "The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak."

Working...