Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

+ - Github Finally Agrees Public Repos Should Have Open Source Licenses-> 2

Submitted by WebMink
WebMink (258041) writes "After strong criticism last year, Github has finally accepted the view that public repositories with no open source license are a bad thing. Self-described as the "world's largest open source community," a significant number of GitHub projects come with no rights whatsoever for you to use their code in an open source project.

But from now on, creators of new repositories will have to pick from a small selection of OSI-approved licenses or explicitly opt for "no license". In Github's words, "please note that opting out of open source licenses doesn't mean you're opting out of copyright law.""

Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Github Finally Agrees Public Repos Should Have Open Source Licenses

Comments Filter:

"All my life I wanted to be someone; I guess I should have been more specific." -- Jane Wagner

Working...