Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


+ - Google: It'd Be Irresponsible Not To Be 'Immoral' 1

Submitted by theodp
theodp (442580) writes "Over at the Guardian, Margaret Hodge and Jeff Jarvis debate the rights and wrongs of the revelation that Google, Starbucks and Amazon pay so little tax in the UK. Hodge is the Chair of a UK parliamentary committee that grilled the three American corporations about creative tax maneuvers that resulted in Amazon paying an effective UK tax rate of 2.5% on 2011 earnings of £309bn, Google paying 0.4% on £2.5bn, and Starbucks paying zilch on UK earnings of £365m. In testimony last week, a Google VP explained, 'We pay all the tax you require us to pay,' adding that the company's tax arrangements are not a matter of 'personal choice' but of a responsibility to shareholders to keep costs down. Hodge replied, 'We're not accusing you of being illegal, we're accusing you of being immoral.'"
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Google: It'd Be Irresponsible Not To Be 'Immoral'

Comments Filter:
  • It's great to raise awareness, but the bigger evils here are the useless politicians that *made* the broken laws.
    Go after the politicians until they simply repair the broken Laws, and the whole thing is solved.

Adding features does not necessarily increase functionality -- it just makes the manuals thicker.