Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

When a primary source isn't good enough- Wikipedia

Comments Filter:
  • Roth tried to have the original claim censored and replaced by his own claims. As such, a request for third-party verification of his claim is not unreasonable. Roth claims that the 'spook' incident occurred in 1985 at Princeton. Both Tumin and Princeton are well enough documented that it shouldn't be that hard to find a verifiable reference. Doing so would both support Roth's claim and provide a useful footnote for history and Wikipedia.

    That having been said, the 'spook' incident and the source of the '

    • by darkonc (47285)
      Because Roth might have reason to deny the Broyard claim if it was true, he's not as authoritative a source on this tiny bit of history as he might imagine.

Vax Vobiscum