Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


+ - Birdsong Isn't Music After All-> 2

Submitted by sciencehabit
sciencehabit (1205606) writes "Although humans have long attributed musical qualities to birdsong, cold, hard statistics show that's all an illusion. Out of the 243 comparisons researchers made between nightingale wrens' songs and musical scales, only six matched harmonic intervals. Despite the beauty of birdsong, when we call it music we’re projecting our own biases."
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Birdsong Isn't Music After All

Comments Filter:
  • Dead wrong. Because we perceive it as music, it is music. It may be different music that is not properly accounted for in the current mathematical models, but that is a shortcoming of the model. Perhaps if we expand the model so that it can account for everything that humans have called music or musical, we will learn something.

    • That was my very first thought too. It's an interesting argument, but not one I'd be likely to confront. I have been far more pleased by the sound (or songs) of birds than with 90% of radio "music". I also wouldn't doubt that in the earlier years of jazz, some argued that it wasn't music, and probably the same for other genres.

Money will say more in one moment than the most eloquent lover can in years.