Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

+ - Incandescents use less energy, CFLs an elaborate c-> 2

Submitted by bluefoxlucid
bluefoxlucid (723572) writes "From the article, "BANNING the humble 60-watt light bulb to make way for so-called energy-saving ones and 'help save the planet' was last night exposed as an elaborate EU con." What justification could the have for such accusations? "The carbon footprint of manufacturing, distribution and disposal of a compact fluorescent bulb is far greater than the energy usage of a standard bulb." Imagine that. Complex electronics and mercury tubes are harder to make than an evacuated glass bulb with a wire in it; and reclaiming hazardous waste takes more energy than just chucking a harmless glass bulb in the standard recycling bin."
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Incandescents use less energy, CFLs an elaborate c

Comments Filter:

The first time, it's a KLUDGE! The second, a trick. Later, it's a well-established technique! -- Mike Broido, Intermetrics

Working...