Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Microsoft

+ - Microsoft Needs to Replace Gates, Not Ballmer

Submitted by theodp
theodp (442580) writes "Over at GeekWire, Todd Bishop posits that Microsoft doesn’t need to replace Steve Ballmer as much as it needs to replace Bill Gates. 'The perennial push to oust Ballmer is back,' Bishop says. 'But as long as we're all going down this path again, there’s actually a larger issue to address: Microsoft no longer has an overarching technology leader next to the CEO at the top of the company – someone with a strong engineering background and technical vision, surveying the field and calling the plays. There will never be another Bill Gates. But there should be someone in his former role as chief software architect, if not in title, then at least in effect.' Ray Ozzie was supposed to be The One, but for some reason that never really worked out (Dave Winer warns BigCo politics can crush even the most innovative). Any thoughts on who might 'fill the bill'?"
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Microsoft Needs to Replace Gates, Not Ballmer

Comments Filter:

1 Billion dollars of budget deficit = 1 Gramm-Rudman

Working...