Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


+ - Did Google Go Instant Just to Show More Ads?-> 1

Submitted by eldavojohn
eldavojohn (898314) writes "Google, already the largest search engine in the United States, went instant a few weeks ago. It's a new feature that none of the competitors have and uses an extra five to fifty kilobytes per search. MIT's tech review asks why Google went instant and is skeptical that users actually look at search results before they finish typing their query. Othar Hansson, Google's lead on the initiative, informs them otherwise and claims that Google's traffic monitors didn't even blink at the extra data being sent across — primarily because of its insignificance next to streaming one video on YouTube. Hansson also reveals that Google's search engine is no longer stateless and therefore takes up a little more memory in their server hives. The Tech Review claims that 'sources at the company say Google Instant's impact on ad sales was a primary focus in testing the service. Google only gets paid for an advertisement, or sponsored link, when a user clicks on the ad, and ads are targeted to specific searches. By displaying a search's ads onscreen a couple of seconds sooner, the frequency of users clicking on those ads could only go up.' So money seemed to be the prime motivator and the article also coyly notes that the average length of time a user spends between typing in any two characters is 300 milliseconds — much too fast for old JavaScript engines. So of course you might recall Google's efforts to change all that with JavaScript speed wars. Do you find Google instant to be useful in anyway or does it strike you as just more ad gravity for your mouse?"
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Did Google Go Instant Just to Show More Ads?

Comments Filter:
  • I don't usually look at anything while typing. The suggestions I do glance at, especially if I don't know how to spell it - but the 'instant feature' ?

    If I'm looking for say "Slashdot google instant ads" to find this article, its likely to only give me the proper link by the fourth word.

    I have a habit of searching by putting "Wider -> Narrower" keywords.

Machines certainly can solve problems, store information, correlate, and play games -- but not with pleasure. -- Leo Rosten