Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

+ - Why Contributor Agreements Are Community-Toxic->

Submitted by
WebMink
WebMink writes "A project dubbed "Harmony", imitated by Canonical, is trying to get so-called "contributor agreements" standardised to save corporations money. But the process could also standardise on copyright aggregation, where community participants donate their work to corporate sponsors. Many big open source communities — including Linux, Apache, GNOME and Mozilla — avoid doing so and have large communities as a consequence. This comprehensive article explores the reasons corporations want copyright aggregation and the reason it's toxic to open source communities."
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Why Contributor Agreements Are Community-Toxic

Comments Filter:

I have hardly ever known a mathematician who was capable of reasoning. -- Plato

Working...