Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×
Patents

+ - First Domino Falls in DNA Patents, Is Code Next ?->

Submitted by anonsdo
anonsdo (1779824) writes "The NY Times reported here ( http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/31/nyregion/31about.html ) on invalidation of a group of DNA patents ( decision here: http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/national/20100329_patent_opinion.pdf ). The basis of the rejection was that "products of nature do not constitute patentable subject matter" (at page 107). This writer wonders what algorithms may be products of nature. Are there encryption algorithms that are products of nature, and therefore not patentable? How about memory storage devices? ...bus architectures? If we find parallels in nature to what we do in code, is it the ultimate "prior art"?"
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

First Domino Falls in DNA Patents, Is Code Next ?

Comments Filter:

"I think Michael is like litmus paper - he's always trying to learn." -- Elizabeth Taylor, absurd non-sequitir about Michael Jackson

Working...