Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×
Intel

+ - A six-core desktop CPU? How many cores is enough?-> 2

Submitted by Dr. Damage
Dr. Damage (123558) writes "Less than two years after introducing its quad-core Core i7 processors, Intel will soon unveil a six-core CPU for the desktop that works as a drop-in replacement for older Core i7-900-series parts. The first previews of the six-core "Gulftown" reveal a chip with 50% more cores and cache that fits into the silicon area and power/thermal envelope as the quad-core it replaces. Performance in multi-threaded applications scales up nicely, but clock speeds—and thus single-threaded performance--remain the same. Do we really need six cores on the desktop? That depends, it would seem, on what you do with your computer."
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

A six-core desktop CPU? How many cores is enough?

Comments Filter:
  • six core ---> Do we really need it --->> May be yes. Upgrading to 8600 processor itself doubled my productivity. Six core I guess it will be super fast.

If it's not in the computer, it doesn't exist.

Working...