Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Earth Government

California To Ban Gas-Powered Leaf Blowers and Mowers (newsobserver.com) 374

"California will soon ban the sale of new gas-powered leaf blowers and lawn mowers," reports the Associated Press, calling it "a move aimed at curbing emissions from a category of small engines on pace to produce more pollution each year than passenger vehicles." California is the only state with the authority to regulate air quality this way, part of an exception carved out in federal law in the 1970s. While other states can't enact their own regulations, they can choose to follow California's lead. Last year, California regulators approved a first-of-its-kind rule to force automakers to sell more electric work trucks and delivery vans. Also last year, Newsom ordered regulators to ban the sale of all new gas-powered cars and trucks in California by 2035 — a date that has since been embraced by some of the world's largest automakers.

California has more than 16.7 million of these small engines in the state, about 3 million more than the number of passenger cars on the road. California was the first government in the world to adopt emission standards for these small engines in 1990. But since then, emissions in cars have vastly improved compared with smaller engines.

Now, state officials say running a gas-powered leaf blower for one hour emits the same amount of pollution as driving a 2017 Toyota Camry from Los Angeles to Denver, a distance of about 1,100 miles (1,770 kilometers). The law Newsom signed also orders regulators to offer rebates for people to change out their equipment, a move aimed at landscaping businesses that use these machines more often. The state budget, approved earlier this year, includes $30 million to pay for this effort.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

California To Ban Gas-Powered Leaf Blowers and Mowers

Comments Filter:
  • We are banning our largest source of clean energy, Diablo canyon, and replacing it with "temporary" natural gas. I wonder how many decades those "temporary" gas plants will run. Banning lawn mowers wont make much a difference. Banning nuclear will kill people though.
    • by XXongo ( 3986865 ) on Sunday October 10, 2021 @02:46PM (#61878023) Homepage

      Banning lawn mowers wont make much a difference.

      It will make a different locally, in that the things are noisy, stinky, and obnoxious.

      • by vlad30 ( 44644 ) on Sunday October 10, 2021 @07:49PM (#61878897)
        "noisy, stinky, and obnoxious" Lets add Maintenance. This describes a of tools of the past however in construction it is rare to see anything but battery powered tools unless the tool is old and serviceable it most likely has been replaced with a just as capable Battery powered option. The last gas powered tool I have personally and still generally see in construction are concrete cutting wet/ saws. Battery versions are now starting in the smaller sizes and they are on the purchase list. If a battery isn't powerful enough they will be Corded electric however when a jackhammer like this was released https://www.milwaukeetool.com/... [milwaukeetool.com]. It is easy to see that even heavy duty tools being replaced by batteries. Many of the tools are a lot quieter due to the brushless motors and other improvements. most of the noise is the by the work actually being done.

        All of the above applies to Landscaping gear from mowers to brush-cutters I have already replaced nearly all my landscaping tools with battery versions. (One exception the mulcher is corded but it is much quieter than the gas version and just as powerful ). And have seen commercial crews with backpack batteries doing larger jobs

        . Summary

        Noisy is reduced to in some cases no longer requiring ear protection

        Stinky - masks not a requirement for many tools and can be used indoors

        Maintenance - much less work in that regard with battery electric

        • Between Ego and Milwaukee the only gas stuff I have left is my mower and I'm looking forward to one day deciding to pull the trigger on one of those lawn roomba style mowers. Not having to clean and fight a fouled snowblower when you can't feel your fingers is so nice.
    • Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)

      by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Sunday October 10, 2021 @02:48PM (#61878031)
      Comment removed based on user account deletion
      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        by teg ( 97890 )

        The fact gasoline-powered leaf blowers are more polluting than cars has been widely known for a while, so yes, it'll make a difference.

        Not in the context of global warming... that said, the local pollution from those is bad (they're not exactly burning the petrol efficiently or fully). I'm so happy that I converted to electric gear 6 years ago, as the exhaust fumes from them certainly don't smell like they're good for you.

    • it looks like a cost factor. They need about $17 billion to keep that plant going safely vs $12-$13 billion to replace it with wind/solar. They guy who got them to shut it down has been trying to since the last 60s. I think it's safe to say the only "succeeded" because the money people weren't going to front the cash to keep the plant going. i.e. he's just a scapegoat in that regard.
  • In a way, the legislation is good, because 2-cycle leaf blowers are really loud, because they have to be light enough to be carried, or carried on someone's back. The people who operate them often don't always have hearing protection.
  • by ThosLives ( 686517 ) on Sunday October 10, 2021 @02:47PM (#61878027) Journal

    This would be great - except for proprietary battery packs. I really wish this legislation was paired with requirements for "generic" rechargeable battery packs or formats for all these electric tools.

    One of the things preventing me from getting more electric tools (like a lawnmower) is that I don't want to be stuck with a particular brand's battery system.

    Not that you can't get "generic" packs for any brand mower, for example, but if the mower dies and you get another brand, the packs are often not compatible between brands.

    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      Standardization would be nice, but is it really that big a deal? My lawn mower is one brand, by leaf blower is another. They use different batteries, but so what? They each came with a battery and charger anyway.

      • by sjames ( 1099 )

        Yes, it matters. One day you might need a new mower. Do you REALLY want to have to re-buy spare battery packs and trash the old ones?

    • by Kremmy ( 793693 )
      I'm a big fan of those unpowered rotary push mowers and plug-in electric blowers and line trimmers. The push mowers work surprisingly well when the time is taken to adjust the breaking edge, but you do have to use them more often as they lose a lot of effectiveness when the grass gets too high. Extension cords are cheap and my electric line trimmer is low enough draw to run it off my solar inverter. Works like a charm.
      • by q_e_t ( 5104099 )

        I'm a big fan of those unpowered rotary push mowers and plug-in electric blowers and line trimmers.

        When I get my lawn tamed and smooth enough, I am tempted to get a push mower. Maybe not quite as big as the one my dad used to use, even though I might actually have more lawn, or maybe because I have more. The big ones are nice in racing green but damn expensive!

    • A bit like laptops then
    • by ceoyoyo ( 59147 )

      They pretty much all use standard cells. If it's actually such a big problem for you, download the model for the battery pack you need, send it off to a 3D printer, put the cells from your current one in, and enjoy.

      • I was just going to say the same thing. I have had to commit myself to Craftsman brand because of the battery packs, but it seems like at least in theory I could get a similar battery, 3D print an adapter, and hook it up. As long as voltage is the same and current comparable, is there any other reason why a different battery shouldn't work?
        • by ceoyoyo ( 59147 )

          I've seen people do it. It works. Various designs freely available on the Internet even improve the ergonomics. You don't really have to worry about the voltage and current because the packs are pretty much just standard cells. Make sure you've got the same type of cell (lithium ion or nicad usually), keep the number of cells the same, and you're good to go.

      • the physical size of the 80v packs is the same gross the major brands. The difference is in the grooves on the pack and/or tool.

        You can cut corresponding grooves, and use a different brand b battery; there are a handful of sites with instruction.

        It's similar, but as I understand not quite as universal, for 40v.

        (and to be clear: 18v and 20v are the same; 80v=4 * 18v, etc. The multiples of 20 are using "peak" voltage of a fully charged 18v).

        also, inside those packs are standard 18650 cells; other sites wi

    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      If I was still an EU citizen I'd be lobbying for this. USB C for charging, and how about USB C for connecting to the tool as well?

      • by q_e_t ( 5104099 )
        Given that you want the tool to be light, I don't think rechargable batteries are the way to go, unless you are going to have some generic battery trolley (think golf bag) with batteries to run everything off, and then a connection from that to the tool so you are at least somewhat independent from mains. Or maybe you drive your Tesla next to the leaves and plug into some utility socket of the Tesla...
    • The problem is the manufacturers are using it for competitive lock-in. Standardization would be quite welcome, but I worry about what it would do to the three Dewalt 20V tools I have, specifically purchased for battery compatibility.

  • by lpq ( 583377 )

    leaf blowers are 2-stroke, they already forced gas mowers to be 4 stroke 10+ years ago

    • leaf blowers are 2-stroke, they already forced gas mowers to be 4 stroke 10+ years ago

      Blowers are much smaller than mowers.

      A 4-stroke will be too heavy.

      Electric is the future.

      • A rake and your arms are the future, just as they were in the past. Pay the neighborhood kid a few bucks to rake. I made pretty good coin here in Ohio from Late Sept to early Nov when I was a kid ... arcade money!
      • I have a 4-stroke leaf blower / weed eater combo. It's heavy and doesn't work quite that well as a blower but it's a decent weed eater. The biggest advantage is that it doesn't go to shit if I forget to drain the fuel out of it when I put it up for storage in the winter. Starts up pretty easily every spring, so overall I'm happy. Could I switch to electric? In my case, I don't see why not. Although I although bought this thing when the electrics weren't quite up for doing a big job.

        As for lawn mowers, no wa

  • Now, state officials say running a gas-powered leaf blower for one hour emits the same amount of pollution as driving a 2017 Toyota Camry from Los Angeles to Denver, a distance of about 1,100 miles (1,770 kilometers).

    Is that a 2-stroke or 4-stroke engine on that leaf-blower -- 'cause they make them both ways but they emit much different levels of pollution.

  • The language of the law is "small offroad engines" and tfa explicitly mentions generators.

    I'm sure this will go over swimmingly in a state where green mandates means the power might go off at night or when the wind isn't blowing, and the money diverted from line maintenance to green mandates means the power might go off because it's a day that ends in a y.

    • The language of the law is "small offroad engines" and tfa explicitly mentions generators.

      Why can't we power the generators with batteries?

  • How do those things produce that much pollution while consuming that little gasoline?
    Sure, the chemical reactions might be different an less eficient and whatnot - but in the end, it's the gasoline that will be converted to CO2 and other stuff - so how do these devices manage to produce that much nasty stuff for the miniscule amount of gas they burn?
    • by jabuzz ( 182671 )

      Because they don't have ECU's with fuel injection and catalytic converters. So the amount of NOx and particulates they produce is truly horrific in comparison to even a diesel gate car. They produce less CO2 but huge quantities of other frankly nastier pollutants.

    • by Kremmy ( 793693 )
      A lot of them are two-stroke engines which burn a mixture of gas and oil, with significantly higher emissions than more complex designs. They totally lack the hardware to allow cleaner emissions.
    • How do those things produce that much pollution while consuming that little gasoline?

      They are talking about traditional pollution, not CO2: CO, NOx, hydrocarbons, etc..

  • ,,, how a lawnmower with 2 gallons of gas in it that doesn't need to be refilled very often can pollute more than a commuter ICE car with a 12 gallon tank which will need to be refilled at least every other week.
    • by Ksevio ( 865461 )

      The car has pollution controls, the lawnmower does not

    • Re: (Score:2, Informative)

      by jabuzz ( 182671 )

      Because they don't have an ECU with a bunch of sensors, doing fuel injection with a catalytic converter. As a result they produce large amounts of NOx and particulates, as a result a lawnmower with a 2 gallon tank will produce more of the above than a ICE car even after several fillups.
      Besides which the comparison is to aggregate amount of garden equipment to the aggregate from cars. As more and more cars become electric then the average amount from a car drops.
      I personally never understood Americans fascin

      • I personally never understood Americans fascination with ICE garden equipment, especially with battery power equipment being so good these day

        Because to get electric battery equipment working like gas and not anemicaly accomplishing the minimum acceptable you need to pay about triple price. In America we only have 1800 watts available on common circuits where the average leaf blower is about 2250 and mower 3750 making corded options very under powered by comparison.

      • by mark-t ( 151149 )

        So what's the ratio per gallon between them?

        How much worse, per gallon, does a lawnmower pollute than an ICE vehicle?

        I'm entirely willing to believe that it's worse, as you say...But exactly how *MUCH* worse is it?

        Per gallon. None of this aggregate crap.

        Where my incredulity comes from in this regard is not out of any personal passion for gasoline powered garden equipment, but that when you factor in how often they need to be refueled, we are talking about more than an order of magnitude of differe

      • I personally never understood Americans fascination with ICE garden equipment, especially with battery power equipment being so good these days.

        I like battery powered lawnmowers. They are quiet and starting is nice. Don't work so great on less than perfect conditions such as damp and or tall grass at least on a (all plastic) model costing over $500 but my ICE lawnmower isn't that great in that dept either.

        My lawnmower is 20 years old purchased for something like $150. Once about every three years I take a 5 gallon can to the gas station to get filled up and change oil every other year.

        Batteries alone for electric lawnmowers cost more than ICE m

    • It’s particulates not CO2 at all.
    • Nobody said anything about "more".

      Both are wrong. The problem here is that ICEs aren't already banned since at least 30 years, like any sane person would have done, because some literal mass-speciecidal* psychopaths wanted to up some fucking number in some fucking bank database! Jeez, name any mass-murdering dictator, and he can't hold a candle to those psychos!

      __
      * Don't like the word either. Anyone got a better term?

    • by sjames ( 1099 )

      The car has a catalytic converter to greatly reduce NOx emissions. It has fuel injection and advanced electronic ignition to limit CO, particulates, and hydrocarbon emissions.

      The car will emit more CO2.

    • by q_e_t ( 5104099 )

      ,,, how a lawnmower with 2 gallons of gas in it that doesn't need to be refilled very often can pollute more than a commuter ICE car with a 12 gallon tank which will need to be refilled at least every other week.

      It's possible to use things other than 2-stroke leaf blowers in future (and it's banning sales, not use, AFAIK) with little impact to most people. There are electric-driven alternatives that people use in other countries. Getting rid of gasoline cars is more complex, so needs a longer time horizon. The point isn't total impact, but low hanging fruit (which leaf blowers are ill-suited to deal with, though).

  • Erm... You can't exactly run a generator on electricity like others of those items.

    • by q_e_t ( 5104099 )
      2-stroke generators - the ones spewing out lots of NOx and particulates. Doesn't apply to 4-stroke ones.
  • IMHE. The purpose of gas-powered leaf blowers is to convince the customer that work is being done. Generally the people that use them spend 15 minutes doing a job that should take 45 if done well, then 45 minutes wandering around with a noisy leaf blower. Because smoke & noise means work.
  • Extremely misleading (Score:2, Informative)

    by burtosis ( 1124179 )
    Small gas engines only pollute particulates in large amounts, NOT CO2. They have unsophisticated lower compression combustion and no catalytic converter, and in the case of two strokes, oil purposely mixed into the gas for lubrication. Sure, they cause lung cancer but aren’t the global environment destroyer for the foreseeable future that CO2 risks. My leaf blower used less than two gallons per year, about the same CO2 as driving 40-60 miles.

    The main problem is lawn mowers are typically around
    • new around here

    • by EvilSS ( 557649 ) on Sunday October 10, 2021 @06:16PM (#61878667)

      Sure, they cause lung cancer but aren’t the global environment destroyer for the foreseeable future that CO2 risks.

      So your argument is that while they will kill people, they won't kill all the people so it's OK? Are you fucking kidding me?

  • Coming soon in California retail of gently used power equiptment imported from other states and a massive uptick in business for small gas engine repair shops from people wanting to keep there current stuff in use.
  • The tool that you use for converging leaves to one point... that has only one mode of operation: Diverging leaves from one point!

    They are so mind-blowingly stupid, surpass even tiny touch screen "keyboards" where you can't even see what you will be activating, and almost beat wireless bike computers that use two batteries and lose several convenient features to span a gap of all of 2 ft! ^^

    Just make a vacuum cleaner for leaves. Done.

    • Diverging works too. You just have to diverge them into someone else's property, and hope they don't have their own blower.

    • Just make a vacuum cleaner for leaves. Done.

      Doesn't work well in a hand portable unit because you need a large vacuum holding canister. Some leaf blowers (rare) DO have a reverse lever and act as a vacuum but the problem is all the debris goes directly into the high speed impeller blades. It mulches leaves and does not clog easy probably due to high centrifugal forces but despite careful throttle control itâ(TM)s only a matter of time till a rock, or pine cone, or stick gets sucked in and fucks it up. They do have them on some riding mowers,

One way to make your old car run better is to look up the price of a new model.

Working...