Larry Ellison Rips HP Board a New One 326
theodp writes "No stranger himself to sexual harassment allegations, Oracle CEO Larry Ellison has denounced HP's directors for forcing the resignation of HP CEO Mark Hurd. 'The HP board just made the worst personnel decision since the idiots on the Apple board fired Steve Jobs many years ago,' Ellison wrote. For now, it seems that Rupert Murdoch is also standing by Hurd, who sits on News Corp's Board of Directors and its Corporate Governance Committee. Less likely to survive the scandal is Hurd's relationship with HP General Counsel Mike Holston, who accepted Hurd's signed separation agreement after leading an investigation into Hurd's actions, which Holston told the NY Times 'showed a profound lack of judgment.' Quite a change from just last year, when Hurd and Holston teamed up to get their daughters' elite prep school a state-of-the-art HP Data Center."
Larry's statement - without logging in. (Score:5, Informative)
Be nice to find another news source - like this one [thestreet.com] where a login was not needed.
"In losing Mark Hurd, the H-P board failed to act in the best interest of H.P.'s employees, shareholders, customers and partners," Ellison wrote in an email to The New York Times, which posted excerpts of the email late Monday. "The H-P board admits that it fully investigated the sexual harassment claims against Mark and found them to be utterly false."
Re:Question: (Score:3, Informative)
My understanding, though I've not read about the case in depth, is that he was accused, he admitted to it, and the accuser had already worked out a resolution, then the crap hit the fan, so to speak.
She didn't want him fired (Score:5, Informative)
Part of the scandal that she didn't want him fired as he had already settled the harassment charges with her. The pictures I saw showed very attractive actress back in her 30s (she is 50 now). She was hired for marketing and networking. ("HP paid her up to $5,000 per event to greet people and make introductions among executives")
She reported unwanted advances and that uncovered a forged dinner reimbursement with her that was why he was ousted. (He probably was with another woman but claimed it was her so he could get dinner reimbursed.) She says she was "surprised and saddened" that Hurd lost his job. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38611219/ns/business-us_business/ [msn.com]
Yes (Score:5, Informative)
He was not fired for the sexual harassment stuff. In fact he was cleared of violating HP's policy and he settled the suit out of court. Both he and woman have confirmed that they did not have a sexual relationship.
He was fired for filing inaccurate expense reports totalling about $20,000. Basically he concealed the fact that he was expensing meetings with this woman. HP has stated that they do have clear evidence of that, and that Hurd admitted it and offered to repay the $20k. Instead they fired him.
He was a superstar manager. If HP's financial performance suffers without Hurd, they could lose tens of billions of dollars in market cap. If that happens I have to think that investors are going to question whether that $20k was worth it.
Re:Sexual harassment (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Yes (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Not a strawman (Score:1, Informative)
It comes from the statement gloria steinem made decades ago, that all men are rapists or potential rapists (paraphrased, don't remember it exactly, but it was a really big deal when she said it). It's been part of the politically correct "feminist" doctrine ever since.
The phrase "all men are rapists" is actually usually attributed to Marilyn French, although even that is incorrect, as it was actually spoken by a fictional character in one of her novels, not by French herself.
The idea that "all men are potential" rapists is part of radical feminism, which is only one faction of feminism, and by no means represents "politically correct 'feminist' doctrine". All too often people assume that "feminism" is a single body of thought, but it is actually quite diverse. Not all feminists hold the "all men are potential rapists" ideal.
Nevertheless, the radical feminist idea of men as potential rapists is widely misunderstood. It does not mean that you, as an individual man, are a potential rapist. It means (overly simplified) that modern patriarchal society socializes men to become rapists. It is a condemnation of societal structures, not men as a sex, nor individuals.
Of course, nobody bothers to learn about these things in order to accept them or criticize them rationally. It's much easier to attack soundbites.
Re:Question: (Score:3, Informative)
But that's not the criteria discussed back when I was on campus. It was about drunk, conscious, girls that may or may not have been acting flirty but were considered unable to give consent.
So knowing that guys were accused and charged at this level of intoxication, the scenario stands as relevant.
Re:Question: (Score:3, Informative)