Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Microsoft

Microsoft Adding jQuery To Visual Studio 67

Tim Anderson writes "Microsoft's Scott Guthrie, Corporate VP of the .NET developer division, announced that the open source jQuery Javascript library will be integrated into Visual Studio, the main Windows development tool. Further, Microsoft will treat jQuery as a supported product within technical support contracts, and will use jQuery to build new controls for ASP.NET, its web platform."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Microsoft Adding jQuery To Visual Studio

Comments Filter:
  • by soliptic ( 665417 ) on Monday October 06, 2008 @11:35AM (#25273759) Journal

    I assume this is a deliberate troll because nobody could actually be that stupid. After all, you don't need to google jquery to see you have it completely backwards, it only requires reading the summary.

    In short: jQuery is not Microsoft's ripoff of anything, and they are not open sourcing it. It already WAS open source (dual MIT/GPL licensed), and it wasn't written by them. It was created by John Resig who now works for Mozilla.

    So far from being the latest example of MS's "Not Invented Here" problem, it's actually a suggestion that they may be overcoming NIH. And when you say "They could have joined the existing communities and worked with them" - that's what they did.

    If you really must come out with a standard-issue anti-MS troll, I believe the "they'll embrace, extend, extinguish it, just you wait and see" one is the correct one to use in this situation.

    Oh, and as for Prototype/scriptaculous doing it better... *shrug* well I prefer jQuery but it's obviously a matter of opinion to some extent, so if you found you prefered them (or mootools, or YUI, or whatever), fair enough. That said, your given justification is off target, jQuery has a plugin system so if you don't want a bunch of UI level stuff but just the "lower-layer stuff", that works too. Admittedly the distinction of what is lower layer and what is plugin may be slightly different between projects, and jquery core does include some animation related stuff, but still, you can't realistically imply jquery is monolithically bloated.

    *sigh* I guess I shouldn't feed the trolls.

  • by ccady ( 569355 ) on Monday October 06, 2008 @11:35AM (#25273767) Journal

    This is just one more in a long line of examples of Microsoft's "Not Invented Here" attitude problem. They could have joined the existing communities and worked with them. Open sourcing jQuery will not fix the problem -- the open source community still hates Microsoft's guts for exactly this type of behavior.

    "You speak of what you know not, O trollish one."

    jQuery was not written by Microsoft. It has been used by many web pages/applications before this announcement.

    jQuery was written by John Resig [wikipedia.org], who currently works for the Mozilla Corporation.

  • by beuges ( 613130 ) on Monday October 06, 2008 @11:47AM (#25273893)
    Not exactly what you were looking for, but how's about a dupe with only one story between it and the original [za.net]?
  • by francium de neobie ( 590783 ) on Monday October 06, 2008 @11:51AM (#25273939)
    Have you ever even learned jQuery?

    Have you ever read the project founder's book? It's not from Microsoft Press. [jspro.org]

    As an open source JavaScript developer I hate IE and Microsoft just as much as the next guy. But if you're going to bash Microsoft, please keep to the facts.

Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (5) All right, who's the wiseguy who stuck this trigraph stuff in here?

Working...