Comcast Says FCC Powerless to Stop P2P Blocking 377
Nanoboy writes "Even if the FCC finds that Comcast has violated its Internet Policy Statement, it's utterly powerless to do anything about it, according to a recent filing by the cable giant. Comcast argues that Congress has not given the FCC the authority to act, that the Internet Policy Statement doesn't give it the right to deal with the issue, and that any FCC action would violate the Administrative Procedures Act of 1946. '"The congressional policy and agency practice of relying on the marketplace instead of regulation to maximize consumer welfare has been proven by experience (including the Comcast customer experience) to be enormously successful," concludes Comcast VP David L. Cohen's thinly-veiled warning to the FCC, filed on March 11. "Bearing these facts in mind should obviate the need for the Commission to test its legal authority."'"
Comcast (Score:3, Insightful)
yea right (Score:3, Insightful)
Second of all, the FCC has been using powers that they weren't directly given (given through court cases that interpreted the laws as giving them such authority) for years, what makes Comcast think this will change for them?
Just how STUPID IS Comcast? (Score:5, Insightful)
Yet Comcast seems intent on making people WANT to regulate them. Its like they are deliberately behaving stupid?
They aren't agressive at pointing out all the other ISPs, to get the heat off.
They do stupid things like pack FCC hearing, say that the results won't matter, etc.
Who's running that place?
Re:yea right (Score:5, Insightful)
A cable company in favor of 'the market'? (Score:5, Insightful)
In other news... (Score:4, Insightful)
Good luck with that.
I don't really understand what Comcast hopes to get out of such an "above the law" argument. It's just bound to piss off the FCC regulators even more and make them more committed to enforcing whatever decision they make against Comcast. Just to show all the other cable companies and telcos that they aren't to be messed with.
What bullshit (Score:5, Insightful)
Yeah, right. Which is why US broadband penetration continues to rank lower and lower worldwide despite $200 Billion from the government. And people are protesting traffic filtering. And your company is so afraid of actual people sitting at an FCC public hearing that they pay people to hold seats for employees, busing the employees in, and locking the public out from the meeting.
What Comcast is doing with the sandvine filtering is forging packets. That's fraud.
Re:Amazing. (Score:3, Insightful)
Other than that, yeah, the internet will be just like China's. I'm glad someone's finally had the balls to stand up and make an erroneous, inflammatory and completely unique critique of the state of freedom in the US.
Competition (Score:4, Insightful)
Comcast's "marketplace" justification doesn't work. Their implication is that having a market means you have competition. But Comcast has a licensed monopoly on the cable network, and some telephone company has a monopoly on the telephone network. That's a market with, at the very most, one competitor.
Re:Comcast (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Just how STUPID IS Comcast? (Score:5, Insightful)
Don't you know by now that most companies in the US sit down and think this out. "Lets see, we can make this much money (A) while screwing the customer. It will take this long (B) to get caught. We will make this much (C = (A X B)). When we get caught it will cost us this much (D) in legal fees and fines. So if C > D then it's what they do."
This is not going to change anytime soon. When the punishments never add up even close to what they make.
Welcome to the Corporate United States Of America.
Re:Just how STUPID IS Comcast? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I Agree With Comcast (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:"nyah-nyah :P"? (Score:3, Insightful)
Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Just how STUPID IS Comcast? (Score:3, Insightful)
Don't sit there and make false accusations that P2P Software does not have any legitimate use or is "disruptive".
P2P is a tool, just like any other tool (gopher, ftp, usenet, et cetera), ands Comcast has no fucking right to block its usage by its customers.
Enforced monopoly should answer to a reg. body (Score:5, Insightful)
I would have absolutely NO qualms about allowing the marketplace to sort this out - unfortunately, the marketplace is artificially sparse.
If a power company with government-mandated monopoly was blocking power to your electric oven because it sucked down too much juice and you ran it all the time, the government would get involved.
If an internet company with government-mandated monopoly blocks bits to a piece of software because it uses too much bandwidth, the regluatory body (FCC) should get involved.
That's how it should work. If you want the government to keep you in power, you gotta make sure your services don't fuck people over. If you don't like it, have fun competing and - well - making consumers happy by striving to have the best and least expensive service. Common fucking sense. Unfortunately there's nothing common about it..
(For those of you who don't think this is an enforced monopoly - Right now I only have one choice for broadband - optimum. Time warner services buildings two blocks from me, but I'm in a different district in brooklyn and TW is legally restricted from servicing the area -- because it's optimum's area.)
Comcast is in Big Trouble (Score:4, Insightful)
What Comcast may not be understanding is that shitting on the FCC now means the FCC will shit on them later. Guaranteed. Comcast is burning bridges.
They need to disassociate their activities completely with any blocking and open the network and become neutral. What the FCC will probably do is give everyone the right to sue Comcast over what the consumer does on line. Essentially they are removing their own neutrality.
Comcast is far to simplistic in their thinking and dangerous in their actions.
Re:Just how STUPID IS Comcast? (Score:5, Insightful)
a) The government sticks its nose in and creates or sanctions a monopoly
b) The government doesn't stick its nose in to break up an illegal monopoly
c) It's the government itself that's providing the service.
d) The company gets too big to care about customers anymore, and implode under the weight of their own bureaucracy.
From companies that have to compete fiercely for my business, I tend to get great service. Abusive and underhanded practices won't keep a company going long, because the negative PR will eventually drive other customers away. It's simple Darwinism - those that don't just don't survive long. Capitalism may not always be pretty, but it sure beats the living hell out of any other system the human race has tried thus far.
Re:Comcast (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:thats the reason for the block (Score:3, Insightful)
The way to fix this is a lawsuit from somebody sued by the RIAA that Comcast should have blocked them from doing bad things (not a common carrier) and/or Comcast should be preventing Media Sentry from trolling Comcast IP addresses looking for infringers (not protecting privacy of it's private clients). After all, if what they manage customers to do is "private" then what other people can access about their network should be "private" too.
Re:Comcast (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I Agree With Comcast (Score:5, Insightful)
Comcast's monopoly techniques and customer complaints to the FCC are likely to result in a review of their decision a few years back that allowed them to get to the position they are in at this time. I tend to suspect that there is a significant percentage of the Comcast subscriber base who would consider an ISP connection cost of $20 a month across their cable plant to be a significant improvement over the current $100+ a month fees. (Sure Internet service is only a $50 part of that bill, unless you decide not to have cable TV service in which case it becomes a $75 a month charge.)
I.e. there's a 250% mark up compared to DSL with possibly double the bandwidth potentially available, and the opportunity to have your P2P sessions interfered with.
A reminder, the reason Comcast has been interfering with P2P sessions is that they have not built the capacity in their plant to handle the volume of customer traffic. They may be really happy to announce that they are now looking at rolling out DOCIS 3 with it's 100 meg to the customer bandwidth, but it appears they have not built the backbone to allow customers to make use of it. Lots of luck there.
Common Carrier. Solved. (Score:3, Insightful)
Here's the solution: Common carrier. There, problem solved.
All you have to do is say, "If you route every packet on your network the same regardless of origin, destination, or content, you are a common carrier, and you are not liable for what those packets constitute. If you treat anything flowing over your network preferentially, you are not a common carrier, and you are liable for the content of ever packet that travels on your network." Simple. Nobody is going to put their company in the path of child pornography enforcement. All this talk of extra legislation for net neutrality is completely unnecessary. The common carrier laws are already in place, the only remaining step is to clarify that they apply to data as well as voice.
I love the idea of net neutrality, but I am convinced we don't need an extra law to make it happen. Just enforce common carrier.
Am I missing something here?
Re:Is there a lawyer in the house? (Score:5, Insightful)
And the people to bitch to about that would be your state and/or local politicians, because that's who granted the monopolies in the first place. I've never heard of a Federal cable franchise agreement......
Re:Challenge (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I Agree With Comcast (Score:3, Insightful)
Quite a few people, actually, but that's not the point (POTS is available on FiOS, albeit without line power). The point is that by cutting out the copper lines to your address you lose the option of switching to a CLEC for DSL or POTS services, i.e: your choices of internet/telephone service providers are reduced.
Re:Comcast (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Comcast (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Comcast (Score:5, Insightful)
Dream on. In America a rich powerful man only goes to prison if a richer, more powerful man wants him there. The rule of law is worthless when legislators are bought and sold like cattle.
For instance, how many Sony executives went to prison for the XCP rootkit? [wikipedia.org] That's right, none. Nobody from Comcast will serve time either, and if they donated enough money to the campaigns of the "elected" officials and legislators they'll continue to be able to abuse their customers.
And now for something completely [uncyclopedia.org] different: [uncyclopedia.org]
-mcgrew
Re:Just how STUPID IS Comcast? (Score:2, Insightful)
It is ALL blocked.
So no more Linux downloads if Comcast has its way. (Also your Usenet solution won't work, if Comcast decides to block that as well.) (And let's not forget how they locked Itunes.com because heaven forbid people watch tv on ipods, instead of on Comcast.)
FCC has Nukes. (Score:3, Insightful)
Spectrum liberation is possible and it would put Comcast and their greasy counterparts in other areas out of business overnight. The FCC and FTC made these bitches and can break them because the public owns the air and public servitude. A sea change in administration is coming. Comcast should shut up before they find themselves replaced. The whole point of creating Comcast and friends was control [slashdot.org]. It would be better to have a government that was interested in freedom but that too would screw Comcast.
Don't be confused by the bluster. The government is in control.
Re:Comcast (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Comcast (Score:5, Insightful)
Actually, it's only a server (in the classical sense) if it accepts incoming connections and most P2P apps (Bittorrent included) will function just fine without this ability, albeit with a reduced number of peers that it can reach.
Re:Just how STUPID IS Comcast? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Comcast (Score:2, Insightful)
When someone screws up there, you can be assured it's taken care off. Not someone getting slapped and being given a golden parachute.
Unless it's an actual golden parachute.
Re:Comcast (Score:4, Insightful)
Uploading isn't prohibited. Waiting for, accepting, and responding to incoming requests on any port is. (Nevermind that ftp kinda works that way for non-passive connections.) Thus, putting your photos on a webserver or your video on youtube is fine. Your webcam probably isn't, though you might be hard-pressed to find a techie at comcast that understands why, or why blanket policies are bad policy.
Re:Comcast (Score:5, Insightful)