Egypt Calls for Bandwidth Rationing 182
I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property writes "Egypt's Ministry of Communications and Information Technology has called upon its citizens to ration their internet usage. This comes after two of its three undersea fiber optic links were recently severed. The cut cables have caused communication difficulties for millions of people throughout the Middle East. Ministry spokesman Mohammed Taymur was quoted as saying, 'People should know how to use the Internet because people who download music and films are going to affect businesses who have more important things to do.'"
Business more important than my porn? NO! (Score:4, Insightful)
God talking heads piss me off some times. Get a clue.
Who is it more important to? (Score:1, Insightful)
I do admit that the curbing of music downloading for personal use may be helpful... but there are musicians who require this for their income as well.
No way I would drop my usage at all.
Re:"More important things to do" (Score:1, Insightful)
Just like with the power outage on the East coast in North America, in times of temporary resource shortage, it is expected that everyone try to help out so that society as a whole does better.
Otherwise, while your jerking off to your fansubs, the local economy might experience some serious problems.
However, that's not to say that the premise of bandwidth "rationing" itself is ignorant - if this was a truly serious emergency, the government could step in and allocate a certain amount of bandwidth to business. Or they could pass some legislation to force ISPs to start throttling users who are using too much bandwidth during peak times.
Re:Next up... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Ah, good times (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:These cables were cut on purpose (Score:2, Insightful)
It would seem that previous history of the NSA indicates their desire for no detection, as compared to an obvious interrruption.
Re:Who is it more important to? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:These cables were cut on purpose (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Compromise (Score:4, Insightful)
Most companies will have one DSL connection. Possibly they'll have an ISDN or second DSL available as backup - but that wouldn't help in this case. All that WOULD help would be a satellite link.
The businesses could well be paying more for their Internet link than individuals anyway - we pay about 6 times more for our DSL than a 'home user' account costs. That gives us a lower contention ratio, plus a basic SLA.
Even in the UK, if two of our transatlantic links were severed at the same time, things would slow to a crawl as data gets routed through Germany etc instead. I remember one failing not too long ago and it was very noticeable.
Two out of three failing at the same time is an exceptional event so you can't really expect a developing country to have more than one redundant link available for their two normal ones. How would your region handle the case where **all** their 'normal' Internet links out of the region were severed and they had to fall back to their redundant links???
They're not asking individuals to stop using the Internet at all, just to cut back on all the movie downloads. One movie download is a few hundred thousand emails after all (most of which will be spam..). Also, using the Internet within the country itself would not be a problem
Re:Ah, good times (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: Network neutrality again (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:These cables were cut on purpose (Score:3, Insightful)
Ok..so exactly when was the internet created and instantiate PRIMARILY for the use of businesses? Oh..that's right...it wasn't.
Thank Goodness!!
Thankfully, it was created so that any computer hooked to it..was just as important as any other...a peer.
I'm all for businesses using it, makes things convenient for many, but, I get irked when you hear things now that sound like the internet IS there primarily for businesses, and that the common user is a tolerated menace.