Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Transportation

$2500 Tata Nano Car Unveiled in India 625

theodp writes "After months of rumors and tantalizing leaks, Tata Motors has finally unveiled the Tata Nano, its already legendary $2,500 car that promises to change the face of not only the Indian car market, but the global auto industry. The tiny car is a four-door, five-seat hatch, powered by a 30 hp engine that gets 54 miles per gallon."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

$2500 Tata Nano Car Unveiled in India

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Somewhere (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Garette ( 206805 ) on Thursday January 10, 2008 @10:09AM (#21982954)
    Would any one in the western world even think of buying this car? Even for driving in the cities/small towns?
  • by madhatter256 ( 443326 ) on Thursday January 10, 2008 @10:22AM (#21983162)
    I think this car would fare better in city markets. They can be used as taxis and replace the gas guzzling V8 Taxis that take up the road in NYC. With the size of the car being small, this can put more cars on the road.
  • I'd buy one, too. (Score:3, Interesting)

    by maillemaker ( 924053 ) on Thursday January 10, 2008 @10:36AM (#21983394)
    I've been waiting for these little micro-cars to come out on the market. I had high hopes for the "Smart Car", but it's price is up around $12,000, and now they are down to 40MPG or so.

    I think we are entering a phase of American driving where people will have a tiny, one-person, gas-sipping commuter car to go to work every day, and a "family car" for long-distance travels on the weekends.

    And before everyone freaks out about the safety, I figure it's safer than a motorcycle.
  • Re:Somewhere (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Lumpy ( 12016 ) on Thursday January 10, 2008 @10:37AM (#21983416) Homepage
    you will never be able to buy one. not in the USA. The auto lobbiests try their hardest to keep cars like that out of the states. they cite BS things like safety and other things.

    That's why it took the SMART almost 8 years to get into the USA. And after "Americanizing" it to make it "safe" (you Canadians and Europeans with your death traps!) it is no longer an affordable car but a expensive curiosity. The Smart can be purchased starting at $18,000 but mostly priced around $24,000 because the only model available is the luxury model. Yes I know this as I talked to the guys out at ZAP! for the past 5 years trying to get one, and now the local dealer that has 4 on the lot and has them priced even higher than the MSRP.

    This car will never be allowed in the USA, you will hear "experts" claim how incredibly unsafe it is, and probably some claiming how bad it pollutes.

  • Re:Somewhere (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 10, 2008 @10:40AM (#21983448)
    The Bug was not VW, Hitler, or Dr. Porsche's idea. It originated in Czech and was stolen, and built upon. It was very likely a much better car than the original Czech version, but it was not an original German idea. I wasn't there first hand to see this happen, but Germany paid restitution for the "stolen IP", so this is pretty much fact in the history books.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 10, 2008 @10:45AM (#21983556)
    Why? short of the "cheapness" a far better solution is something like this velomobile [go-one.us]

    9000mpg, zero emissions other than slightly elevated C02 levels and water vapor. Plus instead of being fat and lazy it makes you lean and fit.

    and before you say anything, Yes I have ridden one. a 10 mile commute in the winter (3 inches of snow on the ground) is very doable. the streamlining makes it really easy to pedal and you can easily maintain 10mph in it. close all the vents and treat the canopy with "never fog" and you actually will take off your jacket because it's so warm.

    Oh and those of you claiming you will get killed, ran over, nobody will see you... Really? in bright yellow cars give you a HUGE safe distance when they pass. It's way safer and practical than a bike.

    Oh and it made me lose nearly 100 pounds.
  • by hey! ( 33014 ) on Thursday January 10, 2008 @11:19AM (#21984108) Homepage Journal
    At $2500, a vehicle like this would be worth buying just for hacking.

    You could take the engine out without a block and tackle, carry it into your apartment, and mess with it on your kitchen table. You could play around with different engines about as easily as you swap a video card in your computer, playing around with Stirling engines or electrical motors or series hybrid configurations, with the the help of a local machine shop, or with after market kits.

    When I was a kid, nearly everybody could do a little work on cars, and everybody at least knew somebody who did fairly major maintenance to their cars, and it was not at all uncommon for people to redesign various aspects of their cars, from boring out their carb jets to monkeying around with their suspension. Today cars are really, really good, and really really reliable. There just isn't much incentive to muck with a $30,000 machine that is pretty damned good already.

    But at $2500, it'd be worth doing just for curiosity, not to mention much easier given the small size of the thing.
  • by Xzzy ( 111297 ) <sether@@@tru7h...org> on Thursday January 10, 2008 @11:20AM (#21984124) Homepage
    Hitler wasn't the only one with the idea anyways. Ferdinand Porsche had been working on the VW for years, it was just coincidence that the two wanted to build the same kind of car at around the same time.

    Hitler was more of a bankroll for the project than inspiration.
  • Re:Somewhere (Score:4, Interesting)

    by TW Atwater ( 1145245 ) on Thursday January 10, 2008 @11:26AM (#21984216)
    The original VW Beetle, which managed to go all over Germany with 4 lard-ass Germans had a 25 hp engine.
  • Re:Somewhere (Score:4, Interesting)

    by argiedot ( 1035754 ) on Thursday January 10, 2008 @11:32AM (#21984336) Homepage
    Agreed! I live here in Chennai, and though I hate the fact that this car just means that there'll be much more traffic, this will be much safer than those two wheelers for those people and it'll be nice for all those people who crowd four people onto a motorbike (it's only twice the cost of a reasonably powerful bike). In that way it's nice. I wonder if there'll be an LPG version, I'm sure that'll be hugely popular if it does come because LPG is about twice the mileage per rupee.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 10, 2008 @11:33AM (#21984356)
    Having born in Pakistan, I feel the need to compete somehow.
    We have built something cheesier than this.
    Check this one out, A four seat vehicle running on 125cc engine.
    http://www.tmcpk.com/ [tmcpk.com]
  • by MichailS ( 923773 ) on Thursday January 10, 2008 @11:50AM (#21984624)
    "that makes the Nano the first time a 2-cylinder gasoline engine will be used in a car with a single balancer shaft."

    I am very curious as to what they mean with this since I am dorking around with analysis on vibrations of such configurations for a living right now.

    A single balance axle makes no sense, it only turns the phase of the vibration direction. You are better off without one at all.

    Unless the cylinders are vertical, since then the vibrations would be vertical without a balance axle, causing the car to jump on the suspension. One balance axle might phase the vibrations horizontally instead, causing less power loss through viscoelastic dampening.

    I am intrigued.
  • Re:I'd buy one, too. (Score:3, Interesting)

    by omeomi ( 675045 ) on Thursday January 10, 2008 @11:55AM (#21984698) Homepage
    I've also seen guys doing wheelies on the highway, and standing on the seat. It seems to depend a lot on the kind of bike. The crotch-rocket folks tend to be the ones riding like idiots. I've never seen a guy on a Harley or a Goldwing doing anything stupid on the highway. I wonder if the accident / death rates confirm this...
  • Re:I'd buy one, too. (Score:1, Interesting)

    by kaizokuace ( 1082079 ) on Thursday January 10, 2008 @11:56AM (#21984710)
    If you'd have visited those other countries like india, china, vietnam etc. you would notice that pedestrians arent idiots and that cars have the right of way simply because a person loses the battle with a car. When everyone is busy looking out for themselves the road systems work. In america (esp here in LA) people are idiots and just assume the instated system to work. Problem is that when someone goes out of line all the people in the vicinity are in danger of crashing, killing, etc. People here just don;t pay attention to the road because we are told that other people have to follow the rules too. We see a lot of accidents here. The time I spent in Asia opened my eyes to how stupid America is when I realized that the lines on the road in Vietnam were mostly a suggestion when I saw a bus trying to overtake a bus on a 2 lane road. Everyone casually just hopped off the road for a second to give birth to the oncoming traffic. I was the idiot that didn't try to get out of the way until the last second. As American's remember that our arrogance is our weakness.
  • Disaster for India (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Electric Eye ( 5518 ) on Thursday January 10, 2008 @12:00PM (#21984764)
    the growth of car ownership in India is going to be one of the worst disasters to hit that country. Just like in China, where car ownership for a billion people is destroying millions of acres of land (roads) and eating up untolds amount of oil. Driver's ed is non-existent, the roads are awful, there are no rules on the road. If you've ever been to India and driven on the roads (and I'm not talking about the insane cities streets) you'll find out very quickly how terrifying that drive can be. Putting a billion more people in cars is not the way to a good future - not for India and not for the rest of the planet. Building a cheap ass car like this will only doom us faster...
  • Re:Somewhere (Score:2, Interesting)

    by dada21 ( 163177 ) <adam.dada@gmail.com> on Thursday January 10, 2008 @12:05PM (#21984834) Homepage Journal
    I just got back from India last night, spending 2 weeks or so in Mumbai, Maharashtra, and in Colva Beach, Goa. I love India, and have a home in Mumbai on a busy street. My wife joined me for the first time, and she can't wait to go back (she's a very white blond gal).

    The traffic SEEMS nuts, but it isn't. It flows and moves with amazing grace, not chaos. Pollution is TERRIBLE, but it isn't just cars and trucks. Once you are familiar with how the roads work, crossing busy streets is easy, and driving isn't too bad. I generally hire a private car for the weeks I spend there each year, but I've driven myself and have little concern for what some people consider a lack of safety standards.

    The Tata cars are great. The Nano will be awesome, considering how many families drives 4-to-a-motorcycle in the worst monsoon weather. The biggest polluters, it seems, are the government's buses, which are ancient and kick out more smoke than the next 50 cars combined. The cabs I used were mostly non-gas and non-diesel (I believe LP or something like it, as I videotaped a refill station and heard the sound of high pressure tanks being filled). No smoke came out of the exhausts like the cities' garbage trucks and buses.

    I love India with a passion, and am planning on working out of my home there for 2+ months a year. The profit margins are amazing, the lack of regulation leads people to push themselves harder, making people wealthy for working hard. I see smiles on even the poorest laborers' faces. I interviewed one young man who pushed a two-wheel 1 ton moving "cart" with some brothers. He made around $1.50 per day, and he said it was the most money anyone in his family made. I asked him what he did with the money, and he said he SAVED IT so he could start a business. He lived with 9 others in his extended family, and had to deal with a 1 hour train ride in each direction just to push a 1 ton cart around by hand.

    I spoke with kids working in the Americanized starbucks-style coffee house. These guys made $3 a day, and they were considered wealthy by friends. We interviewed a film crew at the Bollywood area, and many of them worked more than 70 hours a week, but were able to save more than 50% of their meager salaries.

    Food was excellent. Service was amazing. The level of cleanliness in even the public airport has grown by leaps and bounds in just 2 years. I visit every winter (Chicago winter), and just can't believe how happy the poor and lower class seem with all the options available to work.

    Tata will destroy the American car companies because they are producing what the market wants, not what government requires. Yes, the Nano may see unsafe, but the 10 accidents I witnessed in Mumbai were all related to the same problem: bad, potholed roads. That's not a carmaker's problem. On the road my home is on (Napean Sea Road in a ritzy district), the road outside my house is maintained by our family and the neighbors. THe main part of the road is fixed slowly and politically, but we make sure that the curbside area is maintained perfectly. The bank down the street from my house had 10 laborers using pick-axes to redo the road, and within 10 days it was good as new.

    India, backwards in many ways, but sometimes moving forwards means not understanding how humans work. We want opportunities, and when we find them, we utilize them to better our lives. It's when government gets in the way that people get sad, burdened with debt, and see no hope for the future.

    It was VERY hard to come home. We spent 5 days in Paris total on the trip (going and coming), and 3 days in Dubai. It is very sad when returning to the US brings back the views of people with frowns and anger. When my pro-socialist friends tell me maybe I should move away if I hate the American nationalist-socialist system, now I have a good response: maybe I will.
  • by Adeptus_Luminati ( 634274 ) on Thursday January 10, 2008 @12:06PM (#21984858)
    Suggestions for version 2.0:

    1) Make it 90% electric and 10% biofuel. I only do not say 100% because in India, even in the most modern cities, power goes out like once every couple of weeks or more.
    2) Make a 100% electric one and sell it in China!

    If this is done successful (millions sold) in these 2 countries, we may be able to overcome a major environmental hurdle & TATA should deserve a Nobel for that.

    3) Get the government to subsidize this thing big time. Bring the price down to 0.25 lahks (~$750) and you will see major adoption. $2500 still WAY too expensive in India
    4) Make 100% of parts recyclable & provide locations to do this in major urban cities. That said, Indians are pretty good at using something until it is completely broken and unrepairable. Nearly all buses in Mumbai look like they are from pre-world war II !
    5) Make a door-less version & 100% electrical with "wind-up option" (in case electricity fails in city), and force by law diesel rickshaws to use this instead. Polution in cities will be cut back by 90% if you do this!
    6) Make the horn 50% less loud (at least!). You almost need earplugs to drive around Indian cities.
    7) Make damn well sure it is waterproof; as in, it can be submerssed in 4 feet of water (monsoon seasons) and not leak inside.

    Adeptus
  • Re:Somewhere (Score:3, Interesting)

    by huckamania ( 533052 ) on Thursday January 10, 2008 @12:25PM (#21985146) Journal
    Talk about your double standards. Everyone in your city is going from 50% to 100% in excess of the speed limit but if the cops give any of them a ticket it's a 'revenue generation stakeout'?

    I'd like to see vehicular manslaughter used more in trials when people are speeding, cause an accident and someone gets killed. I'd especially like to see it if the victim is not breaking the speed limit or as we call it in my city, the law.
  • Re:Somewhere (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Alioth ( 221270 ) <no@spam> on Thursday January 10, 2008 @01:05PM (#21985838) Journal
    If the Smart Car is a commercial failure, I'd love to fail like them. Fail all the way to the bank!

    There are LOADS of Smart Cars around here. It's one of the more popular superminis. But then again, here is Rightpondia, where small cars traditionally sell very well anyway.
  • Re:Somewhere (Score:3, Interesting)

    by oatworm ( 969674 ) on Thursday January 10, 2008 @01:10PM (#21985932) Homepage
    Yeah, that pricing is about right. Trouble is, it's still a terrible value proposition. The gas version, which is the only one that'll get sold in the States, gets maybe 40 MPG highway and runs on premium. For about $3k less, you can get a Chevy Aveo, Toyota Yaris, Honda Fit, or a Kia Rio, all of which are twice the car of the Smart, get nearly the same mileage (35ish, usually), can all seat four, and can actually get on to a freeway without killing themselves or their occupants. About the only way the Smart makes sense is if you're really into tight parking spaces, but, outside of a few densely urban areas (New York?), that's really not much of an issue here.

    If the Smart sold for about $4-5k less, it'd make some sense. At its current price point... not so much.
  • by Pig Hogger ( 10379 ) <pig.hogger@g[ ]l.com ['mai' in gap]> on Thursday January 10, 2008 @01:11PM (#21985952) Journal
    Just like the apocryphal story of the Chevy "Nova" not selling in Latin America because "no va" means "won't go", the name "Tata Nano" won't fly in (french) Canada, because both "Tata" and "Nono" (yes, it's an "o") mean "moron", "stupid" or "idiot" in french-canadian slang...
  • Re:I'd buy one, too. (Score:4, Interesting)

    by MSG ( 12810 ) on Thursday January 10, 2008 @02:45PM (#21987774)
    That link isn't a scientific study, and should not be used as the foundation for broad generalizations. Furthermore, it doesn't even support your assertion. It does say that the median age of riders has risen significantly, but does not discuss the relative rates of accidents among younger and older groups.

    The fact is that the best data available today still comes from the Hurt Report (rimary author, Dr. Harry Hurt), even though the study was written in 1981. Just in the last couple of months, the federal government and the AMA have jointly funded a new study intended to update those conclusions.

    The summary of the Hurt Report can be found online, but I think that a couple of these conclusions are relevant here:

    22. The motorcycle riders involved in accidents are essentially without training; 92% were self-taught or learned from family or friends. Motorcycle rider training experience reduces accident involvement and is related to reduced injuries in the event of accidents.

    19. Motorcycle riders between the ages of 16 and 24 are significantly overrepresented in accidents; motorcycle riders between the ages of 30 and 50 are significantly underrepresented. Although the majority of the accident-involved motorcycle riders are male (96%), the female motorcycles riders are significantly overrepresented in the accident data.

    23. More than half of the accident-involved motorcycle riders had less than 5 months experience on the accident motorcycle, although the total street riding experience was almost 3 years. Motorcycle riders with dirt bike experience are significantly underrepresented in the accident data.

    32. Motorcycles equipped with fairings and windshields are underrepresented in accidents, most likely because of the contribution to conspicuity and the association with more experienced and trained riders.

    19 and 32, especially, point to the conclusion that the "older guy on a Harley" is most definitely not more likely to suffer an accident. Younger riders are much more likely to be involved in accidents, as are less experienced riders of any age.

    With that said, the thing that I think is most important is founded on these two conclusions:

    1. Approximately three-fourths of these motorcycle accidents involved collision with another vehicle, which was most usually a passenger automobile.

    6. In the multiple vehicle accidents, the driver of the other vehicle violated the motorcycle right-of-way and caused the accident in two-thirds of those accidents.

    According to the Hurt Report, 50% of all motorcycle accidents are caused by another driver violating the motorcycle's right-of-way. More experienced and better educated riders know this. They know that their age and experience will not remove the threat that they face from other drivers on the road, which is the single biggest threat to their safety. They can only mitigate that threat by constant guard against those violations at the places that they are most likely, and development of countersteering, swerving, and braking skills.

    I am a motorcyclist.

    Probably a young one. ;)
  • by uniquename72 ( 1169497 ) on Thursday January 10, 2008 @05:23PM (#21990516)
    I'm in Vegas and use a motorcycle exclusively all year. I also rode all year when I lived in Southern California and Arizona.

    And although my current motorcycle was $9000, I've owned 2 other great bikes over the past 10 years -- one was $300 ('83 Honda Rebel, lasted me 4 years and is still running well; I sold it to my cousin), the other was $1000 and was great for 5 years (but an accident killed it).

"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." -- Albert Einstein

Working...