OSI Approves Microsoft Ms-PL and Ms-RL 301
Russ Nelson writes "In a board meeting held October 10th and announced today, the Open Source Initiative approved two of Microsoft's software licenses: the Microsoft Reciprocal License and the Microsoft Public License. These licenses are refreshingly short and clean, compared to, say, the GPLv3 and the Sun CDDL. They share a patent peace clause, a no-trademark-license clause, and they differ only in the essential clause of reciprocation. Of course, Microsoft is not widely trusted in the Open Source world, and their motives have been called into question during the approval discussions. How can they be attacking Open Source projects on one hand, and seeking not only to use open source methods, but even to use the OSI Approved Open Source trademark? Nobody knows for sure except Microsoft. But if you are confident that Open Source is the best way to develop software (as we at the Open Source Initiative are), then you can see why Microsoft would both attack Open Source and seek to use it. It is both their enemy and their salvation."
They're animals... (Score:5, Funny)
Captain James T. Kirk: They're animals.
Captain Spock: Jim, there is an historic opportunity here.
Captain James T. Kirk: Don't believe them. Don't trust them.
Captain Spock: They're dying.
Captain James T. Kirk: Let them die!
Re:easy answer (Score:3, Funny)
Well, I am pretty sure this is not a CRC error this time. Sounds more like they are applying quantum computing to their business model. Now, they can make all claims simultaneously, claim they are anything and everything and never have to settle on state of existence. As a bonus, their PR dept can claim the company has working knowledge with successful quantum engine development (and maybe hint that it is a current part of their OS)
InnerWeb