GCC 4.2.1 Released 449
larry bagina writes "GCC 4.2.1 was released 4 days ago. Although this minor update would otherwise be insignificant, it will be the final GPL v2 release; all future releases will be GPL v3. Some key contributors are grumbling over this change and have privately discussed a fork to stay as GPL v2. The last time GCC forked (EGCS), the FSF conceded defeat. How will the FSF/GNU handle the GPL 3 revolt?"
Re:Fact lite submission (Score:5, Funny)
There's this guy Linus [wikipedia.org], he's one. You may have heard of him. He's the guy who created git [wikipedia.org] and some other minor projects.
Re:Fact lite submission (Score:2, Funny)
Re:How will the FSF/GNU handle the GPL 3 revolt? (Score:3, Funny)
Tell that to Novell. :-)
...but even Linux distributors who haven't drunk the MS Kool-aid will be faced with a "choice" between sticking with current versions of key products (with whatever bugs and vulnerabilities come to light), maintaining their own forks, or being bound by the terms of GPLv3.
Darn right!
However, you missed the bit about all the developers who followed FSF's advice about the "or later" clause and now have no choice but to allow their work to be distributed under GPLv3.
Er, no, your "summary" just chose to exclude all the bits from the original that did address the question. However, in case you are havving difficlty with the concept of "metaphor" I fully concede that my post contained absolutely no evidence that any representative of the FSF has ever used a digging implement to compel any third party to physically ingest a software license.
Re:Just my 2 cents (Score:2, Funny)
No you're not. The GPLv4 explicitly disallows you from having any opinion on how the FSF works or you lose your right to have an opinion.