Robot Unravels the Mystery of Walking 134
manchineel writes with a link to a BBC article on the lessons learned from a project in locomotive robotics. 'Runbot', as it is known, is the result of a modern technology combined with a 1930s physiology study into human locomotion. The study found that walking is largely an automatic process; we only engage our brains when we have to navigate around an obstacle or deal with rough terrain. "The basic walking steps of Runbot, which has been built by scientists co-operating across Europe, are controlled by reflex information received by peripheral sensors on the joints and feet of the robot, as well as an accelerometer which monitors the pitch of the machine. These sensors pass data on to local neural loops - the equivalent of local circuits - which analyse the information and make adjustments to the gait of the robot in real time."
Crawl before walk (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Yeah, indeed. None of these walking are that impressive, if you think about it. What would really catch my attention is a robot that gradually learns how to crawl, walk and run on its own, from scratch, just like humans do. Now, that would be something to write home about. In the meantime, I wish those builders of pre-programmed robots the best. Just have fun and keep the grant money flowing but don't tell me you are doing research in AI
Re:Crawl before walk (Score:5, Funny)
Except that 18yrs later it gets drunk and smashes your flying-car forcing you go down to the station in the middle of the night where you get to deal with the cop-bots, admin-bots, legal-bots, insurance-bots,...
Re: (Score:2)
It looks really creepy.
(Sorry, yes, pun intended)
Planar Walker i.e. 2D only (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Of course, I may be missing something in your definition of "2D only", but it was probably lost in the translation to a page of useless google search results :)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Redundant)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Planar Walker i.e. 2D only (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I think that is unfair. They are experimenting with a _different_ paradigm. And the article finishes with the call for further research in adapting to other terrains and the like.
These "baby steps" are precisely the concise research AI needs. It looks like they have made progress in how people _really_ walk. OK, so building on that foundation let's continue work on the interfaces and control units to sense, recognize and adap
Re: (Score:2)
I think that is unfair. They are experimenting with a _different_ paradigm. And the article finishes with the call for further research in adapting to other terrains and the like.
The article reads like an article on the MIT leg lab's "spring chicken" robot from almost 10 years ago. Just about every thing described for this robot was already done on that planar walker (on a larger more realistic scale, I might add). So, rather than comparing it with Asimo, they should compare it with the leg lab robots and tell us what is different from them. Don't build a new car and tell me how it is different from trucks, compare it to other cars. As I said though, this might not be the resea
hmm (Score:1)
So why can't some people walk and chew gum at the same time?
Re: (Score:1)
Wouldn't they have appeared on Ripleys Believe It Or Not?
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
But in any case, isn't the cerebelluem [wikipedia.org] required for motor skills and maintaining balance while walking?
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
It would be interesting to see if people with a higher level of
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think that's right. I broke a small bone in my hand about a month and a half ago (moving a washing machine), and had my lower arm and hand in a cast for a month. I almost fall over a few times when trying to compensate my position and movements with my arms. What's more, when you make an uncontrolled fall you definitely use your arms to compensate by making circular motions and so.
I thought it said wanking (Score:1, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Frist psot (Score:5, Funny)
what awesome bodies we have (Score:5, Insightful)
Especially considering we appear to be a result of dumb luck and retarded fish monkeys..
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
For reference [discovermagazine.com]
Yuur missing a piece (Score:2)
it should be:
"Especially considering we appear to be a result of dumb luck, retarded fish monkeys, and time.."
People just can't or don't take time into account naturally. You see it all the time.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1)
"only manage to produce something that performs the task awkwardly, stupidly or otherwise ineptly"
Or they could miss the point entirely. FTA:
"About half of the time during a gait cycle we are not doing anything, just falling forward. We are propelling ourselves over and over again - like releasing a spring."
I'm sorry, but when I walk, I am not constantly falling forward (maybe a little when I run). Anybody who has actually studied the art of body movement (i.e. past the toddler stage of just getting by) should know that there are better ways to walk than this.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
You can tell if you are doing the former if you trip when your foot catches something. The latter method is recommended for use by aged people due to the decrease in response time and hence increase risk of falling (falling having a higher risk of injury in the elderly
Re: (Score:1)
Please. Amazing? It took you YEARS to master walking, and that is with a LOT of brain activity and non-automatic compensation training caused by your mistakes (falls, trips, tumbles). Yet people are stumped why this robot can't figure it out. How well could it walk in a month if given learning capability?
Re: (Score:2)
Basically, it isn't "dumb luck" or chance at all!
I can't find the exact phrase used by Richard Dawkins in my copy of The God Delusion, but I did find an interview on line, here is a quote,
Re: (Score:2)
learn from mistakes (Score:2, Funny)
Mixed signals (Score:5, Funny)
"How does Runbot walk?"
"The basic walking steps of Runbot"
"When Runbot first encounters a slope these low level control circuits 'believe' they can continue to walk up the slope without having to change anything."
"Runbot walks in a very different way from robots like Asimo, star of the Honda TV adverts, said Prof Woergoetter."
"The first step in building Runbot was creating a biomechanical frame that could support passive walking patterns."
"So using the information from its local circuits Runbot can walk on flat surfaces at speeds of more than three leg lengths per second."
"Prof Woergoetter said Runbot was able to learn new walking patterns after only a few trials."
"Runbot is a small, biped robot which can move at speeds of more than three leg lengths per second, slightly slower than the fastest walking human."
And last but not least:
"Four other scientists - Poramate Manoonpong, Tao Geng, Tomas Kulvicius and Bernd Porr - are also involved in the project, which has been running for the last four years."
Sorry guys, but it really isn't living up to it's name.
Re: (Score:2)
pfft (Score:2)
S E G W A Y
Someone had to say it.
Re: (Score:2)
Obvious? (Score:2)
imagine a beowulf cluster of human brains!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
That's called Internet, and the results have been mixed so far.
Re: (Score:2)
I guess that's the whole point of Beowulf clusters...
and I admire it!
Re: (Score:2)
That's called the "Borg Collective." For some reason, Star Trek didn't depict it in such a good light, although I thought the borg queen was "hot" in a Hellraiser-type of way.
Re:Obvious? (Score:5, Insightful)
Walking isn't an unconscious process because it's too complex for consciousness -- what kind of argument is that? The most complex thinking that humans do (inventing new math, plotting the course of a rocket, designing a 10 million line software system, etc.) is all done CONSCIOUSLY. According to your argument, these tasks should be happening UNconsciously.
Walking is an unconscious process because it doesn't HAVE to be conscious. Why pollute our conscious minds with thought processes that are irrelevant, when all we're trying to do is walk to the fridge and get a beer?
Thought processes tend to be made unconscious once they have been learned and refined to the point where the conscious mind is no longer needed to supervise and correct mistakes. I've noticed this first hand when writing code. I no longer find myself thinking "Okay, I need to declare a variable called x," it just sort of comes out of my fingers, while my conscious mind thinks at some more abstract level. Didn't used to be that way. The ability to place tasks into your unconscious mind is a learned skill, I think.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
When walking down a path or on a sidewalk, have you ever found that the ground below your feet isn't there and you find yourself falling a bit in a panic-state (ie - adrenaline rush and fear)? This usually happens when you walk past a down step or gradient that you did not foresee.
You never think about it but your body is just reacting to the change and trying frantically to find a solid ground. Its not a truly conscious behavior unt
Muscle Memory (Score:4, Interesting)
If you want to play an instrument and sing at the same time, or play two independent instruments at once (piano and especially organ are close enough to qualify, as is something like a Chapman Stick or Megatar), you have to rely on muscle memory that much more, as you now have twice as much to deal with. Doing all that and singing at the same time is more difficult still, and there are plenty of great musicians who never learn this particular stunt. The only way I can play and sing at the same time is to drill one or the other (usually the instrument) until I can do it by habit alone, then layer the other one over it and hope it holds together. Fortunately, woodwind players are not frequently asked to sing while playing, or to play two instruments at once, and if I do have to sing while playing, it's not really an independent act but part of coaxing a particular sound from the instrument.
As is the case with walking, the trick is to practice (a lot) and to accept that you will fall down (a lot) until you get the hang of it. Most of us just don't remember how hard we had to work to learn to walk. Some have to re-learn and could tell you how tough it is, and others still bear the scars of learning in infancy -- I have a scar in one eyebrow from falling into the edge of a table while still learning to walk (and a matching one in the other eyebrow, from learning to fight, but that is another story).
Mal-2
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I think this happens to everybody. But I wonder what part of the brain is still processing the words, going:
"Are you paying attention? You're not listening to me anymore are you. Danm, this always happens when there's no sex or fantastic science-fictiony things. I'm left here moving the eyes, turning the page. The rest of him is wondering how many breasts you could fit on a human torso. *sigh* The most annoying part is when I have to go back and read the same part over again. I mean, I've read all that bef
Re: (Score:2)
No, don't worry
Re: (Score:2)
Mal-2
Re: (Score:2)
This is not true. New math you say? Plotting the course of a rocket you say? No math is "new", it might be "new" to Man, but it's not like Nature wasn't using it since day one. So it's not new at all. Catagorizing and labelling things is NOT difficult, and I don't care how complex the math problem is, that is really all it is, is a lab
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Ugh...first thing I thought of was Congress. That would be a case of THz processing in each of the nodes, with a slightly misconfigured 2600 baud modem for the interconnects...
is it me.... (Score:1)
runbot homepage (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Also, here's the cited paper. [plosjournals.org]
This isn't that novel. It's very much like Randall Beer's insect work [iu.edu] from a decade ago. It's hierarchical control using controllers built from control blocks the authors call "neurons". It's a pure reflex system, with no explicit prediction.
Also notice that it's a planar biped, constrained so that it can't fall sideways.
There's better locomotion and balance work going on in Japanese hobbyist robotics.
It's good that people are working on this stuff again. There was
Cats do more or less the same thing (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Cats do more or less the same thing (Score:5, Funny)
Walking Research (Score:5, Funny)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqhlQfXUk7w [youtube.com]
It's nice to see the Runbot "has been built by scientists co-operating across Europe".
Backyard ant experiment (Score:5, Interesting)
1. Arm yourself with a box cutter, straight razor, razor blade or scalpel
2. Capture your favorite back yard ant.
3. Cut off the ant's head. Be careful not to hurt anything else, don't smash any legs and don't crush any other body parts. If you don't get it right with the first try, try again on your next favorite ant.
4. Discard the head as neither you nor the ant can use it anymore.
5. Let go of the rest of the ant
The ant should now right itself and stand as if awaiting movement instructions.
Some fun experiments:
1. Blow gently on the ant. It should sway in the breeze but generally remain upright.
2. Flick (or blow harder on) the ant without smashing it so that it tumbles some distance. It will right itself and patiently await further instructions.
3. Place the ant on a piece of paper, wait for it to right itself and then flip the paper over. The ant should stay attached to the paper.
Ants are truly miniature engineering marvels.
Re:Backyard ant experiment (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Backyard ant experiment (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Is this a case of a conversation between identical carbon-units? I'm personally too lazy to create more 'me's, so I answer myself via AC like norbal people. If I am wrong, I'm sorry. Carry on...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
s/Die/Doe/
I will refrain from responding from my iPhone in the future ;)
TFA say, humans are fully autonomous too. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Dammit I need to get better at cutting the head of without cutting the front two legs off. Err
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Fastest walking human? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
It should be called "moving as fast as you can while making contact with the ground so that no visible (to the human eye) loss of contact occurs." Granted it's wordy. Rave Walking uses different muscles, and different movement of the legs.
average walking speed is 4-5 MPH. I walk a ten minute mile, and I am considered quick.
Not to imply in anyway 'Race walking' is easy, it's just different then actual walking.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't personally do that, but I was interested in the why, so I looked into it.
Regardless of the excuses, the bottom line is: Because they want to.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If the article made a comparison to "average walking speed" then yes that would be "actual walking" as far as everyone is concerned. In any case
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
and it'll never get out of the lab (Score:2)
So if I want a bipedal robot I have to duplicate your work. Maybe I can read your scientific papers and that will give me 10% of the knowledge you gained in doing this project, but I still have to turn theory into practice.
Commercialize your research already.
The mystery of falling over. . . (Score:2, Funny)
Original article in PLoS Comp. Biol. (Score:1)
Once again... (Score:1)
Almost got it.... (Score:2, Interesting)
Previous trouble with walking (Score:2, Insightful)
Philisophical Implications (Score:2)
mystery? (Score:2)
I prefer the Wabian-2 (Score:4, Funny)
Swiveling hips are the way of the future. ^_^ Here is a demonstration video. [youtube.com] (The giant mech shooting balls at people afterward is unrelated...)
Also check out the related robot Kiyomori. [kiyomori.jp] Because nothing says "We are here to protect you" like traditional armor and GLOWING EYES.
Expert Says Don't Worry About RunBot (Score:2)
Asimo (Score:3)
Based on what I've read and seen, this article is wrong about the Asimo. The Asimo is the only robot I've seen that looks very human in the way it moves. It can walk, run (with both feet leaving the ground), jump, perform a complex dance, get up after a fall, adapt to changes in the terrain, and maintain its balance if something unexpected pushes it. It also treats walking/running as a controlled fall.
It looks like runbot can't even get both feet off the ground, which means it's not running, it's power-walking. The only thing new here may be its "local circuits", which simply means that it has extra CPU's to take the load off the primary CPU.
Same video at YouTube (Score:2)
Fictive walking (Score:2)