First Nations Want Cellphone Revenue 513
Peacenik45 writes "The CBC is reporting that First Nations in Manitoba want compensation for every cell phone signal that passes through their land because it violates their airspace. The Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs recently resolved to negotiate revenue sharing with Manitoba Telecom Services. Ovide Mercredi of the Grand Rapids First Nations says "When it comes to using airspace, it's like using our water and simply because there's no precedent doesn't mean that it's not the right thing to do." This move may inspire First Nations in other provinces to follow suit."
Let's hope they win! (Score:5, Funny)
What resource is being consumed? (Score:5, Funny)
Little known fact (Score:5, Funny)
Now you know!
Re:What resource is being consumed? (Score:5, Funny)
Indeed. (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Let's hope they win! (Score:3, Funny)
A private land owner getting a decision like that is the kind of thing that would get the constitution amended in the U.S., and would make the Queen angry in Canada.
how did I forget... (Score:3, Funny)
6. NO profit.
Re:Let's hope they win! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Desperation (Score:5, Funny)
A tinfoil teepee?
I have a better idea (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Stop the insanity. (Score:3, Funny)
Ovide Mercredi (Score:5, Funny)
We open up the dining room for dinner early for him and his group (about 10 people), as they had to get to a meeting. I get chosen to serve their table. Hey, it's as close to "celebrity" as I've ever seen in this place, so I consider it somewhat of an honour.
So I introduce myself to the table and run through the spiel. I hand everyone the menus, and then explain the day's "special" (not on the menu). I then explain that all entres come with your choice of pototoes. Now, the kitchen prepared different styles of potatoes: sometimes they were scalloped, or oven roasted, but most often the choices were mashed pototoes or a baked potato. I've been working at this place for a couple of summers now, so the words just flow off my tongue automatically. Plus, I'm a bit nervous, so I'm talking a bit faster than normal. On this afternoon, I say the same thing I've said hundreds of times: "All dinners come with your choice of pototoes: mashed or baked."
Mercredi is in the middle of sipping a glass of water. As I say this, he nearly sprays the water across the table, looks up at me, and blurts out, "What kind of potatoes!?"
Instantly, I (and the rest of the table) realize how the phrase "mashed or baked" can sound if you are being a little rushed!
Naturally, the table explodes with laughter, and I just about kill myself laughing too. They enjoyed the meal, but of course had to make a comment on how "creamy" the mashed potatoes were, and wanted to make sure that they weren't the "mashedorbaked" style of potatoes.
I wonder if he still remembers that afternoon?
Re:Their terminology intrigues me (Score:2, Funny)
The ultimate time share (Score:5, Funny)
Re:What resource is being consumed? (Score:4, Funny)
They are First Nations peoples, and are therefore not required to show any demonstrable harm from any thing any where at any time. They are born harmed, they live harmed, and they will die harmed, and as an evil white slave-driving colonizer you will pay them the required tribute no matter when your ancestors got here and you *damned* sure will keep your mouth shut when you get the invoice. Now get out your wallet, bend over, and shut your goddamned oppressor pie-hole.
By the way, the Right Reverend Sharpton gets here in an hour. Do you have your checkbook on you?
Re:devil's advocate says: spectrum (Score:5, Funny)
Let's see if the current POTUS can shed any light on that question...
"Tribal sovereignty means that; it's sovereign. I mean, you're a -- you've been given sovereignty, and you're viewed as a sovereign entity. And therefore the relationship between the federal government and tribes is one between sovereign entities." -- GWB
Re:Their terminology intrigues me (Score:3, Funny)
Contracts are contracts, some countries treat their indigenous populations even more unfairly but when you make treaties you are bound by them, so it seems likely they have a legally arguable point because in auctioning off that bandwidth with in their airspace and then legally denying access to that bandwidth via government legislation effectively means that the bandwidth was stolen from them within their airspace.
Re:Moderating (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Not a problem... (Score:2, Funny)
They immigrated too ya know
Re:And next? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Why limit yourself? (Score:3, Funny)